The Annals of Applied Probability

A new coalescent for seed-bank models

Jochen Blath, Adrián González Casanova, Noemi Kurt, and Maite Wilke-Berenguer

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected) We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber. If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text


We identify a new natural coalescent structure, which we call the seed-bank coalescent, that describes the gene genealogy of populations under the influence of a strong seed-bank effect, where “dormant forms” of individuals (such as seeds or spores) may jump a significant number of generations before joining the “active” population. Mathematically, our seed-bank coalescent appears as scaling limit in a Wright–Fisher model with geometric seed-bank age structure if the average time of seed dormancy scales with the order of the total population size $N$. This extends earlier results of Kaj, Krone and Lascoux [J. Appl. Probab. 38 (2011) 285–300] who show that the genealogy of a Wright–Fisher model in the presence of a “weak” seed-bank effect is given by a suitably time-changed Kingman coalescent. The qualitatively new feature of the seed-bank coalescent is that ancestral lineages are independently blocked at a certain rate from taking part in coalescence events, thus strongly altering the predictions of classical coalescent models. In particular, the seed-bank coalescent “does not come down from infinity,” and the time to the most recent common ancestor of a sample of size $n$ grows like $\log\log n$. This is in line with the empirical observation that seed-banks drastically increase genetic variability in a population and indicates how they may serve as a buffer against other evolutionary forces such as genetic drift and selection.

Article information

Ann. Appl. Probab. Volume 26, Number 2 (2016), 857-891.

Received: November 2014
Revised: February 2015
First available in Project Euclid: 22 March 2016

Permanent link to this document

Digital Object Identifier

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)

Zentralblatt MATH identifier

Primary: 60K35: Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory [See also 82B43, 82C43]
Secondary: 92D10: Genetics {For genetic algebras, see 17D92}

Wright–Fisher model seed-bank coalescent coming down from infinity age structure


Blath, Jochen; González Casanova, Adrián; Kurt, Noemi; Wilke-Berenguer, Maite. A new coalescent for seed-bank models. Ann. Appl. Probab. 26 (2016), no. 2, 857--891. doi:10.1214/15-AAP1106.

Export citation


  • [1] Berestycki, N. (2009). Recent Progress in Coalescent Theory. Ensaios Matemáticos 16. Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática, Rio de Janeiro.
  • [2] Blath, J., González Casanova, A., Eldon, B. and Kurt, N. (2014). Genealogy of a Wright Fisher model with strong seed-bank component. Preprint.
  • [3] Blath, J., González Casanova, A., Kurt, N. and Spanò, D. (2013). The ancestral process of long-range seed bank models. J. Appl. Probab. 50 741–759.
  • [4] Dong, R., Gnedin, A. and Pitman, J. (2007). Exchangeable partitions derived from Markovian coalescents. Ann. Appl. Probab. 17 1172–1201.
  • [5] Etheridge, A. (2011). Some Mathematical Models from Population Genetics. Lecture Notes in Math. 2012. Springer, Heidelberg.
  • [6] Ethier, S. N. and Kurtz, T. G. (2005). Markov Processes: Characterization and Convergence, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.
  • [7] Feller, W. (1968). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. Vol. I, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York.
  • [8] Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford Univ. Press, London.
  • [9] Goldschmidt, C. and Martin, J. B. (2005). Random recursive trees and the Bolthausen–Sznitman coalescent. Electron. J. Probab. 10 718–745 (electronic).
  • [10] González Casanova, A., Aguirre-von Wobeser, E., Espín, G., Servín-González, L., Kurt, N., Spanò, D., Blath, J. and Soberón-Chávez, G. (2014). Strong seed-bank effects in bacterial evolution. J. Theoret. Biol. 356 62–70.
  • [11] Herbots, H. M. (1994). Stochastic models in population genetics: Genealogical and genetic differentiation in structured populations. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. London.
  • [12] Herbots, H. M. (1997). The structured coalescent. In Progress in Population Genetics and Human Evolution (Minneapolis, MN, 1994). IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 87 231–255. Springer, New York.
  • [13] Jansen, S. and Kurt, N. (2014). On the notion(s) of duality for Markov processes. Probab. Surv. 11 59–120.
  • [14] Jenkins, P. A., Fearnhead, P. and Song, Y. S. (2014). Tractable stochastic models of evolution for loosely linked loci. Available at arXiv:1405.6863.
  • [15] Kaj, I., Krone, S. M. and Lascoux, M. (2001). Coalescent theory for seed bank models. J. Appl. Probab. 38 285–300.
  • [16] Kingman, J. F. C. (1982). The coalescent. Stochastic Process. Appl. 13 235–248.
  • [17] Lennon, J. T. and Jones, S. E. (2011). Microbial seed banks: The ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nature Reviews Microbiology 9 119–130.
  • [18] Levin, D. A. (1990). The seed bank as a source of genetic novelty in plants. Amer. Nat. 135 563–572.
  • [19] Neuhauser, C. and Krone, S. M. (1997). The genealogy of samples in models with selection. Genetics 145 519–534.
  • [20] Notohara, M. (1990). The coalescent and the genealogical process in geographically structured population. J. Math. Biol. 29 59–75.
  • [21] Nunney, L. (2002). The effective size of annual plant populations: The interaction of a seed bank with fluctuating population size in maintaining genetic variation. Amer. Nat. 160 195–204.
  • [22] Pitman, J. (1999). Coalescents with multiple collisions. Ann. Probab. 27 1870–1902.
  • [23] Schweinsberg, J. (2000). A necessary and sufficient condition for the $\Lambda$-coalescent to come down from infinity. Electron. Commun. Probab. 5 1–11 (electronic).
  • [24] Takahata, N. (1988). The coalescent in two partially isolated diffusion populations. Genet. Res. 53 213–222.
  • [25] Tellier, A., Laurent, S. J. Y., Lainer, H., Pavlidis, P. and Stephan, W. (2011). Inference of seed bank parameters in two wild tomato species using ecological and genetic data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 17052–17057.
  • [26] Templeton, A. R. and Levin, D. A. (1979). Evolutionary consequences of seed pools. Amer. Nat. 114 232–249.
  • [27] Vitalis, R., Glémin, S. and Oliviere, I. (2004). When genes got to sleep: The population genetic consequences of seed dormancy and monocarpic perenniality. Amer. Nat. 163 295–311.
  • [28] Wakeley, J. (2009). Coalescent Theory. Roberts and Co, Greenwood Village, Colorado.
  • [29] Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16 97–159.
  • [30] Živković, D. and Tellier, A. (2012). Germ banks affect the inference of past demographic events. Mol. Ecol. 21 5434–5446.