In this paper, we introduce a one-dimensional model of particles performing independent random walks, where only pairs of particles can produce offspring (“cooperative branching”), and particles that land on an occupied site merge with the particle present on that site (“coalescence”). We show that the system undergoes a phase transition as the branching rate is increased. For small branching rates, the upper invariant law is trivial, and the process started with finitely many particles a.s. ends up with a single particle. Both statements are not true for high branching rates. An interesting feature of the process is that the spectral gap is zero even for low branching rates. Indeed, if the branching rate is small enough, then we show that for the process started in the fully occupied state, the particle density decays as one over the square root of time, and the same is true for the decay of the probability that the process still has more than one particle at a later time if it started with two particles.
Ann. Appl. Probab.
25(3):
1616-1649
(June 2015).
DOI: 10.1214/14-AAP1032
[1] Athreya, S. R. and Swart, J. M. (2005). Branching–coalescing particle systems. Probab. Theory Related Fields 131 376–414. MR2123250 10.1007/s00440-004-0377-4[1] Athreya, S. R. and Swart, J. M. (2005). Branching–coalescing particle systems. Probab. Theory Related Fields 131 376–414. MR2123250 10.1007/s00440-004-0377-4
[2] Bezuidenhout, C. and Gray, L. (1994). Critical attractive spin systems. Ann. Probab. 22 1160–1194. MR1303641 10.1214/aop/1176988599 euclid.aop/1176988599
[2] Bezuidenhout, C. and Gray, L. (1994). Critical attractive spin systems. Ann. Probab. 22 1160–1194. MR1303641 10.1214/aop/1176988599 euclid.aop/1176988599
[3] Bezuidenhout, C. and Grimmett, G. (1990). The critical contact process dies out. Ann. Probab. 18 1462–1482. MR1071804 10.1214/aop/1176990627 euclid.aop/1176990627
[3] Bezuidenhout, C. and Grimmett, G. (1990). The critical contact process dies out. Ann. Probab. 18 1462–1482. MR1071804 10.1214/aop/1176990627 euclid.aop/1176990627
[4] Bezuidenhout, C. and Grimmett, G. (1991). Exponential decay for subcritical contact and percolation processes. Ann. Probab. 19 984–1009. MR1112404 10.1214/aop/1176990332 euclid.aop/1176990332
[4] Bezuidenhout, C. and Grimmett, G. (1991). Exponential decay for subcritical contact and percolation processes. Ann. Probab. 19 984–1009. MR1112404 10.1214/aop/1176990332 euclid.aop/1176990332
[6] Blath, J. and Kurt, N. (2011). Survival and extinction of caring double-branching annihilating random walk. Electron. Commun. Probab. 16 271–282. MR2802043 10.1214/ECP.v16-1631[6] Blath, J. and Kurt, N. (2011). Survival and extinction of caring double-branching annihilating random walk. Electron. Commun. Probab. 16 271–282. MR2802043 10.1214/ECP.v16-1631
[9] Durrett, R. (1980). On the growth of one-dimensional contact processes. Ann. Probab. 8 890–907. MR586774 10.1214/aop/1176994619 euclid.aop/1176994619
[9] Durrett, R. (1980). On the growth of one-dimensional contact processes. Ann. Probab. 8 890–907. MR586774 10.1214/aop/1176994619 euclid.aop/1176994619
[10] Durrett, R. (1988). Lecture Notes on Particle Systems and Percolation. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove, CA. MR940469[10] Durrett, R. (1988). Lecture Notes on Particle Systems and Percolation. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Pacific Grove, CA. MR940469
[12] Eichelsbacher, P. and König, W. (2008). Ordered random walks. Electron. J. Probab. 13 1307–1336. MR2430709 10.1214/EJP.v13-539[12] Eichelsbacher, P. and König, W. (2008). Ordered random walks. Electron. J. Probab. 13 1307–1336. MR2430709 10.1214/EJP.v13-539
[13] Gray, L. (1986). Duality for general attractive spin systems with applications in one dimension. Ann. Probab. 14 371–396. MR832015 10.1214/aop/1176992522 euclid.aop/1176992522
[13] Gray, L. (1986). Duality for general attractive spin systems with applications in one dimension. Ann. Probab. 14 371–396. MR832015 10.1214/aop/1176992522 euclid.aop/1176992522
[16] Jansen, S. and Kurt, N. (2014). On the notion(s) of duality for Markov processes. Probab. Surv. 11 59–120. MR3201861 10.1214/12-PS206 euclid.ps/1398778562
[16] Jansen, S. and Kurt, N. (2014). On the notion(s) of duality for Markov processes. Probab. Surv. 11 59–120. MR3201861 10.1214/12-PS206 euclid.ps/1398778562
[17] Lawler, G. F. and Limic, V. (2010). Random Walk: A Modern Introduction. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 123. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. MR2677157[17] Lawler, G. F. and Limic, V. (2010). Random Walk: A Modern Introduction. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 123. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. MR2677157
[21] Neuhauser, C. (1994). A long range sexual reproduction process. Stochastic Process. Appl. 53 193–220. MR1302910 10.1016/0304-4149(94)90063-9[21] Neuhauser, C. (1994). A long range sexual reproduction process. Stochastic Process. Appl. 53 193–220. MR1302910 10.1016/0304-4149(94)90063-9
[22] Neuhauser, C. and Pacala, S. W. (1999). An explicitly spatial version of the Lotka–Volterra model with interspecific competition. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9 1226–1259. MR1728561 10.1214/aoap/1029962871 euclid.aoap/1029962871
[22] Neuhauser, C. and Pacala, S. W. (1999). An explicitly spatial version of the Lotka–Volterra model with interspecific competition. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9 1226–1259. MR1728561 10.1214/aoap/1029962871 euclid.aoap/1029962871
[23] Noble, C. (1992). Equilibrium behavior of the sexual reproduction process with rapid diffusion. Ann. Probab. 20 724–745. MR1159570 10.1214/aop/1176989802 euclid.aop/1176989802
[23] Noble, C. (1992). Equilibrium behavior of the sexual reproduction process with rapid diffusion. Ann. Probab. 20 724–745. MR1159570 10.1214/aop/1176989802 euclid.aop/1176989802
[24] Park, S. (2012). Critical decay exponent of the pair contact process with diffusion. Preprint. Available at arXiv:1202.6024. 1202.6024[24] Park, S. (2012). Critical decay exponent of the pair contact process with diffusion. Preprint. Available at arXiv:1202.6024. 1202.6024
[26] Soucaliuc, F., Tóth, B. and Werner, W. (2000). Reflection and coalescence between independent one-dimensional Brownian paths. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 36 509–545. MR1785393 10.1016/S0246-0203(00)00136-9[26] Soucaliuc, F., Tóth, B. and Werner, W. (2000). Reflection and coalescence between independent one-dimensional Brownian paths. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Stat. 36 509–545. MR1785393 10.1016/S0246-0203(00)00136-9
[27] Sturm, A. and Swart, J. (2008). Voter models with heterozygosity selection. Ann. Appl. Probab. 18 59–99. MR2380891 10.1214/07-AAP444 euclid.aoap/1199890015
[27] Sturm, A. and Swart, J. (2008). Voter models with heterozygosity selection. Ann. Appl. Probab. 18 59–99. MR2380891 10.1214/07-AAP444 euclid.aoap/1199890015
[28] Swart, J. M. (2013). Noninvadability implies noncoexistence for a class of cancellative systems. Electron. Commun. Probab. 18 1–12. MR3064997 10.1214/ECP.v18-2471[28] Swart, J. M. (2013). Noninvadability implies noncoexistence for a class of cancellative systems. Electron. Commun. Probab. 18 1–12. MR3064997 10.1214/ECP.v18-2471
[29] Swart, J. M. and Vrbenský, K. (2010). Numerical analysis of the rebellious voter model. J. Stat. Phys. 140 873–899. MR2673338 10.1007/s10955-010-0021-x[29] Swart, J. M. and Vrbenský, K. (2010). Numerical analysis of the rebellious voter model. J. Stat. Phys. 140 873–899. MR2673338 10.1007/s10955-010-0021-x