Open Access
December 2013 Hedging of game options with the presence of transaction costs
Yan Dolinsky
Ann. Appl. Probab. 23(6): 2212-2237 (December 2013). DOI: 10.1214/12-AAP898

Abstract

We study the problem of super-replication for game options under proportional transaction costs. We consider a multidimensional continuous time model, in which the discounted stock price process satisfies the conditional full support property. We show that the super-replication price is the cheapest cost of a trivial super-replication strategy. This result is an extension of previous papers (see [Statist. Decisions 27 (2009) 357–369] and [Ann. Appl. Probab. 18 (2008) 491–520]) which considered only European options. In these papers the authors showed that with the presence of proportional transaction costs the super-replication price of a European option is given in terms of the concave envelope of the payoff function. In the present work we prove that for game options the super-replication price is given by a game variant analog of the standard concave envelope term. The treatment of game options is more complicated and requires additional tools. We combine the theory of consistent price systems together with the theory of extended weak convergence which was developed in [Weak convergence of stochastic processes for processes viewed in the strasbourg manner (1981) Preprint]. The second theory is essential in dealing with hedging which involves stopping times, like in the case of game options.

Citation

Download Citation

Yan Dolinsky. "Hedging of game options with the presence of transaction costs." Ann. Appl. Probab. 23 (6) 2212 - 2237, December 2013. https://doi.org/10.1214/12-AAP898

Information

Published: December 2013
First available in Project Euclid: 22 October 2013

zbMATH: 1318.91182
MathSciNet: MR3127933
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1214/12-AAP898

Subjects:
Primary: 91B28
Secondary: 60F15 , 91A05

Keywords: Game options , Optimal stopping , super-replication , Transaction costs

Rights: Copyright © 2013 Institute of Mathematical Statistics

Vol.23 • No. 6 • December 2013
Back to Top