We present a formalization of first-order predicate calculus with
equality which, unlike traditional systems with axiom schemata or substitution
rules, is finitely axiomatized in the sense that each step in a formal proof
admits only finitely many choices. This formalization is primarily based on
the inference rule of condensed detachment of Meredith. The usual
primitive notions of free variable and proper substitution are absent, making
it easy to verify proofs in a machine-oriented application. Completeness
results are presented. The example of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory is shown to
be finitely axiomatized under the formalization. The relationship with
resolution-based theorem provers is briefly discussed. A closely related
axiomatization of traditional predicate calculus is shown to be complete in a
strong metamathematical sense.
References
[1] Boyer, R., E. Lusk, W. McCune, R. Overbeek, M. Stickel, and L. Wos, ``Set theory in first order logic: clauses for Gödel's axioms,'' Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol. 2 (1986), pp. 287--327.
[2] Church, A., Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Volume 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1956.
[3] Cohen, P. J., Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, W. A. Benjamin, Reading, 1966.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR38:999
[4] Hamilton, A. G., Logic for Mathematicians, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
[5] Hindley, J. R., and D. Meredith, ``Principal type-schemes and condensed detachment,'' The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 55 (1990), pp. 90--105.
[6] Kalish, D., and R. Montague, ``On Tarski's formalization of predicate logic with identity,'' Archiv für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, vol. 7 (1965), pp. 81--101.
[7] Kalman, J. A., ``Condensed detachment as a rule of inference,'' Studia Logica, vol. 42 (1983), pp. 443--451.
[8] Kleene, S. C., Introduction to Metamathematics, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1952.
[9] Megill, N. D., and M. W. Bunder, ``Weaker D-complete logics,'' The University of Wollongong Department of Mathematics Preprint Series no. 15/94.
[10] Mendelson, E., Introduction to Mathematical Logic, second edition, Van Nostrand, New York, 1979.
[11] Meredith, D., ``In memoriam Carew Arthur Meredith (1904--1976),'' Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 18 (1977), pp. 513--516.
[12] Mints, G., and T. Tammet, ``Condensed detachment is complete for relevance logic: a computer-aided proof,'' Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol. 7 (1991), pp. 587--596.
[13] Monk, J. D., ``Substitutionless predicate logic with identity,'' Archiv für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, vol. 7 (1965), pp. 103--121.
[14] Nemeti, I., ``Algebraizations of quantifier logics, an overview,'' version 11.4, preprint, Mathematical Institute, Budapest, 1994. A shortened version without proofs appeared in Studia Logica, vol. 50 (1991), pp. 485--569.
[15] Peterson, J. G., ``An automatic theorem prover for substitution and detachment systems,'' Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 19 (1978), pp. 119--122.
[16] Robinson, J. A., ``A machine-oriented logic based on the resolution principle,'' Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 12 (1965), pp. 23--41.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR30:732
[17] Tarski, A., ``A simplified formalization of predicate logic with identity,'' Archiv für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, vol. 7 (1965), pp. 61--79.
[18] Tarski, A., and S. Givant, A Formalization of Set Theory Without Variables, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 41, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1987.
[19] Wos, L., Automated Reasoning: 33 Basic Research Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1987
[20] Wos, L., R. Overbeek, E. Lusk and J. Boyle, Automated Reasoning: Introduction and Applications, second edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992.
[21] Wos, L. T., and G. A. Robinson, ``Maximal models and refutation completeness: semidecision procedures in automated theorem proving,'' pp. 609--639 in Word Problems: Decision Problems and the Burnside Problem in Group Theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 71, edited by W. W. Boone, F. B. Cannonito, and R. C. Lyndon, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.
[22] Zeman, J. J., Modal Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1973.