The aim of this paper is to give a certain algebraic account
of truth: we want to define what we mean by De Morgan-valued truth
models and show their existence even in the case of
semantical closure: that is, languages may contain their own
truth predicate if they are interpreted by De Morgan-valued
models. Before we can prove this result, we have to repeat some basic
facts concerning De Morgan-valued models in general, and we will
introduce a notion of truth both on the object- and on the
metalanguage level appropriate for such models. The definitions and
the existence theorem are extensions of Kripke's, Woodruff's, and
Visser's concepts and results concerning three- and four-valued truth
models.
References
[1] Barwise, J., and J. Etchemendy, The Liar, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
[2]Belnap, N. D. Jr., and J. H. Spencer, ``Intensionally complemented distributive lattices,'' Portugaliae Mathematica, vol. 25 (1966), pp. 99--104.
[3]Belnap, N. D. Jr., ``A useful four-valued logic,'' pp. 8--37 in Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, edited by J. M. Dunn and G. Epstein, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977.
[4]Bialynicki-Birula, A., and H. Rasiowa, ``On the representation of quasi-boolean algebras,'' Bulletin Academie Polen. Sci. Cl., vol. 3 (1957), pp. 259--61.
[5]Dunn, J. M., ``Intensional algebras,'' pp. 180--206 in Entailment, edited by A. R. Anderson and N. D. Belnap Jr., Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR406756
[6]Dunn, J. M., ``Relevance logic and entailment,'' pp. 117--224 in Handbook of Philosophical Logic III, edited by D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.
[7]Gupta, A., and N. Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993.
[8]Hermes, H., Einführung in die Verbandstheorie, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967.
[9]Kalman, J. A., ``Lattices with involution,'' Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 87 (1958), 485--91.
[10]Koppelberg, S., Handbook of Boolean Algebras, vol. 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.
[11]Kripke, S. A., ``Outline of a theory of truth,'' The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 72 (1975), pp. 690--716.
[12]Leitgeb, H., Truth as Translation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, 1998.
[13]Martin, R. L., and P. W. Woodruff, ``On representing `True-in-$L$' in $L$,'' Philosophia, vol. 5 (1975), pp. 213--17.
[14]McGee, V., Truth, Vagueness and Paradox, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 1991.
[15]Monteiro, A., ``Matrices de Morgan caractèristiques pour le calcul propositionnel classique,'' An. Acad. Brasil, Ci., vol. 32 (1960), pp. 1--7.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR28:18
[16]Rescher, N., Many-valued Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.
[17]Rosser, J. B., Simplified Independence Proofs, Academic Press, New York, 1969.
[18]Tarski, A., ``Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen,'' Studia Philosophica, vol. 1 (1935), pp. 261--405.
[19]Tarski, A., ``The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics,'' Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 4 (1944), pp. 341--76.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR10521
[20]Visser, A., ``Four valued semantics and the Liar,'' Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 13 (1984), pp. 695--708.
[21]Visser, A., ``Semantics and the Liar Paradox,'' pp. 617--706, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic IV, edited by D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1989.
[22]Woodruff, P. W., ``Paradox, truth and logic. Part 1: paradox and truth,'' Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 13 (1984), pp. 213--32.