Bernoulli

Tightness for the interface of the one-dimensional contact process

Enrique Andjel, Thomas Mountford, Leandro P.R. Pimentel, and Daniel Valesin

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

We consider a symmetric, finite-range contact process with two types of infection; both have the same (supercritical) infection rate and heal at rate 1, but sites infected by Infection 1 are immune to Infection 2. We take the initial configuration where sites in (−∞, 0] have Infection 1 and sites in [1, ∞) have Infection 2, then consider the process ρt defined as the size of the interface area between the two infections at time t. We show that the distribution of ρt is tight, thus proving a conjecture posed by Cox and Durrett in [Bernoulli 1 (1995) 343–370].

Article information

Source
Bernoulli Volume 16, Number 4 (2010), 909-925.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 18 November 2010

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bj/1290092889

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.3150/09-BEJ236

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
05858602

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR2759162

Citation

Andjel, Enrique; Mountford, Thomas; Pimentel, Leandro P.R.; Valesin, Daniel. Tightness for the interface of the one-dimensional contact process. Bernoulli 16 (2010), no. 4, 909--925. doi:10.3150/09-BEJ236. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bj/1290092889.


Export citation

References

  • [1] Bezuidenhout, C. and Gray, L. (1994). Critical attractive spin systems. Ann. Probab. 22 1160–1194.
  • [2] Bezuidenhout, C. and Grimmett, G. (1990). The critical contact process dies out. Ann. Probab. 18 1462–1486.
  • [3] Cox, J. and Durrett, R. (1995). Hybrid zones and voter model interfaces. Bernoulli 1 343–370.
  • [4] Durrett, R. (1984). Oriented percolation in two dimensions. Ann. Probab. 12 999–1040.
  • [5] Durrett, R. (1988). Lecture Notes on Particle Systems and Percolation. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • [6] Durrett, R. and Møller, A. (1991). Complete convergence theorem for a competitive model. Probab. Theory Related Fields 88 121–136.
  • [7] Durrett, R. and Swindle, G. (1991). Are there bushes in a forest? Stochastic Process. Appl. 37 19–31.
  • [8] Liggett, T. (1985). Interacting Particle Systems. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 276. New York: Springer.
  • [9] Liggett, T., Schonmann, R. and Stacy, A. (1997). Domination by product measures. Ann. Probab. 25 71–95.
  • [10] Mountford, T. and Sweet, T. (2000). An extension of Kuczek’s argument to nonnearest neighbor contact process. J. Theoret. Probab. 13 1061–1081.