The Annals of Applied Statistics

Chemical and forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullet lots: Is a second shooter possible?

Cliff Spiegelman, William A. Tobin, William D. James, Simon J. Sheather, Stuart Wexler, and D. Max Roundhill

Full-text: Open access

Abstract

The assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy (JFK) traumatized the nation. In this paper we show that evidence used to rule out a second assassin is fundamentally flawed. This paper discusses new compositional analyses of bullets reportedly to have been derived from the same batch as those used in the assassination. The new analyses show that the bullet fragments involved in the assassination are not nearly as rare as previously reported. In particular, the new test results are compared to key bullet composition testimony presented before the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA). Matches of bullets within the same box of bullets are shown to be much more likely than indicated in the House Select Committee on Assassinations’ testimony. Additionally, we show that one of the ten test bullets is considered a match to one or more assassination fragments. This finding means that the bullet fragments from the assassination that match could have come from three or more separate bullets. Finally, this paper presents a case for reanalyzing the assassination bullet fragments and conducting the necessary supporting scientific studies. These analyses will shed light on whether the five bullet fragments constitute three or more separate bullets. If the assassination fragments are derived from three or more separate bullets, then a second assassin is likely, as the additional bullet would not easily be attributable to the main suspect, Mr. Oswald, under widely accepted shooting scenarios [see Posner (1993), Case Closed, Bantam, New York].

Article information

Source
Ann. Appl. Stat. Volume 1, Number 2 (2007), 287-301.

Dates
First available in Project Euclid: 30 November 2007

Permanent link to this document
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1196438019

Digital Object Identifier
doi:10.1214/07-AOAS119

Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet)
MR2415736

Zentralblatt MATH identifier
1126.62129

Keywords
Forensic CABL heterogeneity bullet

Citation

Spiegelman, Cliff; Tobin, William A.; James, William D.; Sheather, Simon J.; Wexler, Stuart; Roundhill, D. Max. Chemical and forensic analysis of JFK assassination bullet lots: Is a second shooter possible?. Ann. Appl. Stat. 1 (2007), no. 2, 287--301. doi:10.1214/07-AOAS119. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoas/1196438019.


Export citation

References

  • Carriquiry, A. (2006). Comment: “Further arguments against CABL as a forensic tool.” Chance 19 25–26.
  • Guinn, V. P. (1979). JFK assassination: Bullet analyses. Anal. Chem. 51 484A–493A.
  • Knoll, G. F. (1979). Radiation Detection and Measurement. Wiley, New York.
  • National Research Council (2004). Forensic Analysis: Weighing Bullet Lead Evidence. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
  • Peele, E. R., Havekost, D. G., Halberstam, R. C., Koons, R. D., Peters, C. A. and Riley, J. P. (1991). Comparison of bullets using the elemental composition of the lead component. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Forensic Aspects of Trace Evidence 57–68. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
  • Posner, G. (1993). Case Closed. Bantam, New York.
  • Rahn, K. A. and Sturdivan, L. M. (2004). Neutron activation and the JFK assassination. Part I. Data and interpretation. J. Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 262 205–213.
  • Randich, E. and Grant, P. M. (2006). Proper assessment of the JFK assassination bullet lead evidence from metallurgical and statistical perspectives. J. Forensic Sci. 51 717–728.
  • Spiegelman, C. H. and Kafadar, K. (2006). Data integrity and the scientific method: The case of bullet lead data as forensic evidence. Chance 19 17–24.
  • Sturdivan, L. M. and Rahn, K. A. (2004). Neutron activation and the JFK assassination. Part II. Extended benefits. J. Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 262 215–222.
  • Tobin, W. A. and Thompson, W. C. (2006). Evaluating and challenging forensic identification evidence. The Champion NACDL 12–21.
  • U.S. Congress House, Select Committee on Assassinations. (1979). Report of the Select Commitee on Assassinations of the U.S. House of Representatives. 95th Cong., 2nd Sess., House Report No. 95-1828, Part 1-b, Washington, GPO.

Supplemental materials