Source: Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 53, Number 2
(2012), 187-192.
The purpose of this note is to present a simplification of the system of
arithmetical axioms given in previous work; specifically, it is shown how the
induction principle can in fact be obtained from the remaining axioms, without
the need of explicit postulation. The argument might be of more general
interest, beyond the specifics of the proposed axiomatization, as it highlights
the interaction of the notion of Dedekind-finiteness and the induction
principle.
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription
detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide
you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify
you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to
this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you
may need to update your profile to register your subscription.
Read more about accessing full-text
References
Antonelli, G. A., "The nature and purpose of numbers", The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 107 (2010), pp. 191–212.
Antonelli, G. A., "Notions of invariance for abstraction principles", Philosophia Mathematica. Series III, vol. 18 (2010), pp. 276–92.
Antonelli, G. A., "Numerical abstraction via the Frege quantifier", Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 51 (2010), pp. 161–79.
Boolos, G., "For every ${A}$ there is a ${B}$", Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 12 (1981), pp. 465–66.
Floyd, R. W., and R. Beigel, The Language of Machines. An Introduction to Computability and Formal Languages, Computer Science Press, New York, 1994.
Linnebo, Ø., "Predicative fragments of Frege arithmetic", Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 10 (2004), pp. 153–74.