Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Church's Thesis and the Conceptual Analysis of Computability

Michael Rescorla
Source: Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 48, Number 2 (2007), 253-280.

Abstract

Church's thesis asserts that a number-theoretic function is intuitively computable if and only if it is recursive. A related thesis asserts that Turing's work yields a conceptual analysis of the intuitive notion of numerical computability. I endorse Church's thesis, but I argue against the related thesis. I argue that purported conceptual analyses based upon Turing's work involve a subtle but persistent circularity. Turing machines manipulate syntactic entities. To specify which number-theoretic function a Turing machine computes, we must correlate these syntactic entities with numbers. I argue that, in providing this correlation, we must demand that the correlation itself be computable. Otherwise, the Turing machine will compute uncomputable functions. But if we presuppose the intuitive notion of a computable relation between syntactic entities and numbers, then our analysis of computability is circular.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 00A30, 03A05
Secondary Subjects: 03D10
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1179323267
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1179323267
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2306396
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 1139.03027

References

[1] Boolos, G., and R. C. Jeffrey, Computability and Logic, 2d edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR603622
Zentralblatt MATH: 0708.03001
[2] Copeland, J., ``The Church-Turing thesis,'' Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2002 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta.
[3] Fodor, J., The Language of Thought, edited by J. Katz, D. Langendoen, and G. Miller, Thomas Y. Crowell, New York, 1975.
[4] Frege, G., "Function and concept", pp. 130--48 in The Frege Reader, edited by M. Beaney, translated by P. Geach, Blackwell, Malden, 1997.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0967.01008
[5] Gandy, R., "Church's thesis and principles for mechanisms", pp. 123--48 in The Kleene Symposium (Proceedings of the Symposium, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1978), edited by J. Barwise, H. J. Keisler, and K. Kunen, vol. 101 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR591879
Zentralblatt MATH: 0465.03022
[6] Gandy, R., "The confluence of ideas in 1936", pp. 55--111 in The Universal Turing Machine: A Half-Century Survey, edited by R. Herken, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press, New York, 1988.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1011468
Zentralblatt MATH: 0689.01010
[7] Gödel, K., "On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems. I", pp. 145--95 in Collected Works. Vol. I. Publications 1929--1936, edited by S. Feferman et al., translated by J. van Heijenoort, The Clarendon Press, New York, 1986.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR831941
Zentralblatt MATH: 0592.01035
[8] Gödel, K., "On undecidable propositions of formal mathematical systems", pp. 346--71 in Collected Works. Vol. I. Publications 1929--1936, edited by S. Feferman et al., translated by J. van Heijenoort, The Clarendon Press, New York, 1986.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR831941
Zentralblatt MATH: 0592.01035
[9] Kleene, S. C., "Turing's analysis of computability, and major applications of it", pp. 17--54 in The Universal Turing Machine: A Half-Century Survey, edited by R. Herken, Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press, New York, 1988.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1011467
Zentralblatt MATH: 0655.03027
[10] Machtey, M., and P. Young, An Introduction to the General Theory of Algorithms, North-Holland, New York, 1978. Computer Science Library-Theory of Computation Series.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR483344
Zentralblatt MATH: 0376.68027
[11] Martin-Löf, P., Intuitionistic Type Theory, vol. 1 of Studies in Proof Theory. Lecture Notes, Bibliopolis, Naples, 1984. Notes by Giovanni Sambin.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR769301
Zentralblatt MATH: 0571.03030
[12] Parsons, C., "Mathematical intuition", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 80 (1980), pp. 145--68.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0840.00006
[13] Parsons, C., "Intuition and number", pp. 141--57 in Mathematics and Mind (Amherst, MA, 1991), edited by A. George, Logic and Computation in Philosophy, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1373896
Zentralblatt MATH: 0807.00011
[14] Parsons, C., ``What can we do `in principle'?'' pp. 335--54 in Logic and Scientific Methods (Florence, 1995), edited by M. L. Dalla Chiara, K. Doets, D. Mundici, and J. van Benthem, vol. 259 of Synthese Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1997.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1797115
Zentralblatt MATH: 0913.03006
[15] Post, E., "Absolutely unsolvable problems and relatively undecidable propositions account of an anticipation", pp. 338--433 in The Undecidable. Basic Papers on Undecidable Propositions, Unsolvable Problems and Computable Functions, edited by M. Davis, Dover Publications Inc., Mineola, 2004. Corrected reprint of the 1965 original (Raven Press, Hewlett; MR0189996).
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2070909
Zentralblatt MATH: 1099.03002
[16] Quine, W. V. O., Word and Object, Studies in Communication. The Technology Press, Cambridge, 1960.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR0111674
Zentralblatt MATH: 0093.00915
[17] Rogers, H., Jr., Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability, 2d edition, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR886890
[18] Shapiro, S., "Acceptable notation", Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 23 (1982), pp. 14--20.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR634739
Zentralblatt MATH: 0452.68055
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1093883561
Project Euclid: euclid.ndjfl/1093883561
[19] Sieg, W., "Mechanical procedures and mathematical experience", pp. 71--117 in Mathematics and Mind (Amherst, MA, 1991), edited by A. George, Logic and Computation in Philosophy, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1373894
Zentralblatt MATH: 0816.03001
[20] Sieg, W., "Calculations by man and machine: Conceptual analysis", pp. 390--409 in Reflections on the Foundations of Mathematics. Essays in Honor of Solomon Feferman (Stanford, CA, 1998), edited by W. Sieg, R. Sommer, and C. Talcott, vol. 15 of Lecture Notes in Logic, Association for Symbolic Logic, Natick, 2002.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1943317
Zentralblatt MATH: 1014.03009
[21] Sieg, W., and J. Byrnes, "$K$"-graph machines: Generalizing Turing's machines and arguments", pp. 98--119 in Gödel '96 (Brno, 1996), edited by P. Hájek, vol. 6 of Lecture Notes in Logic, Springer, Berlin, 1996.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1441105
Zentralblatt MATH: 0856.03032
[22] Sieg, W., and J. Byrnes, "Gödel, Turing, and $K$"-graph machines, pp. 57--66 in Logic and Foundations of Mathematics (Florence, 1995), edited by A. Cantini, E. Casari, and P. Minari, vol. 280 of Synthese Library, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1739858
Zentralblatt MATH: 0949.03034
[23] Soare, R. I., Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees. A Study of Computable Functions and Computably Generated Sets, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR882921
Zentralblatt MATH: 0623.03042
Zentralblatt MATH: 0667.03030
[24] Soare, R. I., "Computability and recursion", The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 2 (1996), pp. 284--321.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1416870
Zentralblatt MATH: 0861.03031
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/420992
Project Euclid: euclid.bsl/1182353451
[25] Turing, A., "On the computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem", pp. 116--54 in The Undecidable. Basic Papers on Undecidable Propositions, Unsolvable Problems and Computable Functions, edited by M. Davis, Dover Publications Inc., Mineola, 2004. Corrected reprint of the 1965 original (Raven Press, Hewlett; MR0189996).
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2070909
Zentralblatt MATH: 1099.03002

2013 © University of Notre Dame

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Turn MathJax Off
What is MathJax?