Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

A Syntactic Approach to Maksimova's Principle of Variable Separation for Some Substructural Logics

Bayu Surarso, H. Naruse, and H. Ono
Source: Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 39, Number 1 (1998), 94-113.

Abstract

Maksimova's principle of variable separation says that if propositional formulas $A_1 \supset A_2$ and $B_1 \supset B_2$ have no propositional variables in common and if a formula $A_1\wedge B_1 \supset A_2\vee B_2$ is provable, then either $A_1 \supset A_2$ or $B_1 \supset B_2$ is provable. Results on Maksimova's principle until now are obtained mostly by using semantical arguments. In the present paper, a proof-theoretic approach to this principle in some substructural logics is given, which analyzes a given cut-free proof of the formula $A_1\wedge B_1 \supset A_2\vee B_2$ and examines how the formula is derived. This analysis will make clear why Maksimova's principle holds for these logics.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 03B20
Secondary Subjects: 03F03
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1039293022
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR1671734
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1039293022
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 0967.03017

References

[1] Anderson, A. R., and N. D. Belnap, Jr., Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR53:10542
Zentralblatt MATH: 0323.02030
[2] Bayu Surarso, ``Interpolation theorem for some distributive logics,'' forthcoming in Mathematica Japonica.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2001d:03057
Zentralblatt MATH: 0957.03032
[3] Bayu Surarso, and H. Ono, ``Cut elimination in noncommutative substructural logics,'' Reports on Mathematical Logic, vol. 30 (1996), pp. 13--29.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2000a:03096
Zentralblatt MATH: 0896.03048
[4] Chagrov, A., and M. Zakharyaschev, ``The undecidability of the disjunction property of propositional logics and other related problems,'' The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 58 (1993), pp. 967--1002.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR94i:03048
Zentralblatt MATH: 0799.03009
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2275108
[5] Dunn, J. M., ``Consecution formulation of positive $R$ with co-tenability and $t$,'' pp. 381--91 in Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. 1, edited by A. R. Anderson and N. D. Belnap, Princeton University Press, Princeton,1975.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR406756
Zentralblatt MATH: 0323.02030
[6] Dunn, J. M., ``Relevance logic and entailment,'' pp. 117--224 in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 3, edited by D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0875.03051
[7] Giambrone, S., ``$TW_+$ and $RW_+$ are decidable,'' The Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 14 (1985), pp. 235--54.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR87i:03021a
Zentralblatt MATH: 0587.03014
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF00249365
[8] Maksimova, L., ``The principle of separation of variables in propositional logics,'' Algebra i Logika, vol. 15 (1976), pp. 168--84.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR58:21417
Zentralblatt MATH: 0363.02024
[9] Maksimova, L., ``Interpolation properties of superintuitionistic logics,'' Studia Logica, vol. 38 (1979), pp. 419--28.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR81f:03035
Zentralblatt MATH: 0435.03021
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF00370479
[10] Maksimova, L., ``Relevance principles and formal deducibility,'' pp. 95--97 in Directions in Relevant Logic, edited by J. Norman and R. Sylvan, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1989.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0731.03014
[11] Maksimova, L., ``On variable separation in modal and superintuitionistic logics,'' Studia Logica, vol. 55 (1995), pp. 99--112.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR96j:03034
Zentralblatt MATH: 0840.03017
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF01053034
[12] Mints, G. E., ``Cut elimination theorem for relevant logics,'' Journal of Soviet Mathematics, vol. 6 (1976), pp. 422--28.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR49:8823
Zentralblatt MATH: 0379.02011
[13] Ono, H., ``Structural rules and a logical hierarchy,'' pp. 95--104 in Mathematical Logic, edited by P. P. Petkov, Plenum Press, New York, 1990.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR91j:03073
Zentralblatt MATH: 0790.03007
[14] Ono, H., ``Semantics for substructural logics,'' pp. 259--91 in Substructural Logics, edited by K. Došen and P. Schröeder-Heister, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR95f:03013
Zentralblatt MATH: 0941.03522
[15] Ono, H., and Y. Komori, ``Logics without the contraction rule,'' The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 50 (1985), pp. 169--201.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR87a:03053
Zentralblatt MATH: 0583.03018
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2273798
[16] Slaney, J., ``Solution to a problem of Ono and Komori,'' The Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 18 (1989), pp. 103--11.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR90c:03050
Zentralblatt MATH: 0671.03036
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF00296176

2012 © University of Notre Dame

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Turn MathJax Off
What is MathJax?