Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Skolem Redux

W. D. Hart
Source: Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 41, Number 4 (2000), 399-414.

Abstract

Hume's Principle requires the existence of the finite cardinals and their cardinal, but these are the only cardinals the Principle requires. Were the Principle an analysis of the concept of cardinal number, it would already be peculiar that it requires the existence of any cardinals; an analysis of bachelor is not expected to yield unmarried men. But that it requires the existence of some cardinals, the countable ones, but not others, the uncountable, makes it seem invidious; it is as if an analysis of people required that there be men but not women, or whites but not blacks. If we deprive the Principle of existential commitments, it will cease to yield Dedekind's axioms for the natural numbers and so fail a good test of material adequacy. But since there are cardinals no second-order theory guarantees, neither can the Principle be beefed up to require all cardinals.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 00A30
Secondary Subjects: 03A05, 03E55
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1038336883
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1038336883
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR1963489
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 1014.03503

References

[1]špace-9pt Barwise, J., Admissible Sets and Structures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR54:12519
Zentralblatt MATH: 0316.02047
[2]špace-3pt Benacerraf, P., "What numbers could not be", Philosophical Review, vol. 74 (1965), pp. 47--73.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR171702
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2183530
[3]špace-3pt Boolos, G., "Saving Frege from contradiction", pp. 438--52 in Frege's Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1995. Originally published in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 87 (1986/87), pp. 137--51.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1376407
Zentralblatt MATH: 0972.03502
[4] Boolos, G., "Nominalist Platonism", pp. 73--87 in Logic, Logic, and Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1998. Originally published in Philosophical Review, vol. 94 (1985), pp. 327--44.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2000b:03005
Zentralblatt MATH: 0972.03514
[5] Boolos, G., "On second-order logic", pp. 37--53 in Logic, Logic, and Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1998. Originally published in Journal of Philosophy, vol. 72 (1975), pp. 509--27.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2000b:03005
Zentralblatt MATH: 0972.03525
[6] Boolos, G., "To be is to be a value of a variable (or to be some values of some variables)", pp. 54--72 in Logic, Logic, and Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1998. Originally published in Journal of Philosophy, vol. 81 (1984), pp. 430--49.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2000b:03005
Zentralblatt MATH: 0972.03535
[7] Boolos, G., and R. Jeffrey, Computability and Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3d edition, 1989.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR90h:03001
Zentralblatt MATH: 0708.03001
[8] Burali-Forti, C., "A question on transfinite numbers", pp. 104--11 in From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879--1931, edited by J. van Heijenoort, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1967.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR35:15
Zentralblatt MATH: 0183.00601
[9] Cantor, G., "Letter to Dedekind", pp. 113--17 in From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879--1931, edited by J. van Heijenoort, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1967.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR35:15
Zentralblatt MATH: 0183.00601
[10] Church, A., Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Vol. I, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1956.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR18,631a
Zentralblatt MATH: 0073.24301
[11] Dreben, B., and J. van Heijenoort, "Introductory note to 1929, 1930, and 1930a", pp. 44--59 in Kurt Gödel, Collected Works, edited by S. Feferman et al., The Clarendon Press, New York, 1986. Publications 1929--1936.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR87h:01096
Zentralblatt MATH: 0592.01035
[12] Hart, W. D., "Skolem's promises and paradoxes", Journal of Philosophy, vol. 67 (1970), pp. 98--109.
[13] Hart, W. D., "On an argument for formalism", Journal of Philosophy, vol. 71 (1974), pp. 29--46.
[14] Hart, W. D., "The potential infinite", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 76 (1975--1976), pp. 247--64.
[15] Hart, W. D., "Russell and Ramsey", Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 64 (1983), pp. 193--210.
[16] Hasenjaeger, G., "Sets, models and recursion theory", pp. 173--82 in On Löwenheim-Skolem-Type Insufficiencies of Second Order Logic, edited by J. N. Crossley, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR220583
[17] Henkin, L., "The completeness of the first-order functional calculus", The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 14 (1949), pp. 159--66.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR11,487d
Zentralblatt MATH: 0034.00602
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2267044
[18] Henkin, L., "Completeness in the theory of types", The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 15 (1950), pp. 81--91.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR12,70b
Zentralblatt MATH: 0039.00801
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2266967
[19] Hilbert, D., "On the infinite", page 376 in From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879--1931, edited by J. van Heijenoort, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1967.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR35:15
Zentralblatt MATH: 0183.00601
[20] Hylton, P., Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analyic Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1990.
[21] Löwenheim, L., "On possibilities in the calculus of relatives", pp. 228--51 in From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879--1931, edited by J. van Heijenoort, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1967.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR35:15
Zentralblatt MATH: 0183.00601
[22] Parsons, C., "Frege's theory of number", pp. 150--75 in Mathematics in Philosophy, Cornell University, Ithaca, 1983.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR86a:01050
Zentralblatt MATH: 0900.03011
[23] Parsons, C., "Frege's theory of number", pp. 180--203 in Philosophy in America, edited by M. Black, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1965. Reprinted in Frege's Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1376396
[24] Quine, W. V., "Ontological relativity and other essays", in Ontological Relativity, Columbia University Press, New York, 1969.
[25] Quine, W. V. O., Methods of Logic, Henry Holt & Company, New York, 1950.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR12,233a
Zentralblatt MATH: 0038.14811
[26] Quine, W. V. O., Set Theory and Its Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1969.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR43:37
Zentralblatt MATH: 0193.30402
[27] Resnik, M. D., "Second-order logic still wild", The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 85 (1988), pp. 75--87.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR89c:03010
[28] Skolem, T., "Logico-combinatorial investigations in the satisfiability or provability of mathematical propositions: A simplified proof of a theorem by L." Löwenheim and generalizations of the theorem, pp. 252--63 in From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879--1931, edited by J. van Heijenoort, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1967.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR35:15
Zentralblatt MATH: 0183.00601
[29] Skolem, T., "Some remarks on axiomatized set theory", pp. 290--301 in From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879--1931, edited by J. van Heijenoort, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1967.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR35:15
Zentralblatt MATH: 0183.00601
[30] Weyl, H., Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1949. Revised and augmented English edition based on a translation by Olaf Helmer.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR10,670c
Zentralblatt MATH: 0033.24209
[31] Zermelo, E., "Investigations in the foundations of set theory I", pp. 199--215 in From Frege to Gödel. A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879--1931, edited by J. van Heijenoort, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1967.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR35:15
Zentralblatt MATH: 0183.00601

2013 © University of Notre Dame

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Turn MathJax Off
What is MathJax?