Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic

Truth and the Liar in De Morgan-Valued Models

Hannes Leitgeb

Source: Notre Dame J. Formal Logic Volume 40, Number 4 (1999), 496-514.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to give a certain algebraic account of truth: we want to define what we mean by De Morgan-valued truth models and show their existence even in the case of semantical closure: that is, languages may contain their own truth predicate if they are interpreted by De Morgan-valued models. Before we can prove this result, we have to repeat some basic facts concerning De Morgan-valued models in general, and we will introduce a notion of truth both on the object- and on the metalanguage level appropriate for such models. The definitions and the existence theorem are extensions of Kripke's, Woodruff's, and Visser's concepts and results concerning three- and four-valued truth models.

Primary Subjects: 03Gxx
Secondary Subjects: 03Bxx
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ndjfl/1012429715
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR1858239
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1305/ndjfl/1012429715
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 0989.03009

References

[1] Barwise, J., and J. Etchemendy, The Liar, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR88k:03009
Zentralblatt MATH: 0678.03001
[2]Belnap, N. D. Jr., and J. H. Spencer, ``Intensionally complemented distributive lattices,'' Portugaliae Mathematica, vol. 25 (1966), pp. 99--104.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR35:1519
Zentralblatt MATH: 0158.27103
[3]Belnap, N. D. Jr., ``A useful four-valued logic,'' pp. 8--37 in Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, edited by J. M. Dunn and G. Epstein, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR58:5021
Zentralblatt MATH: 0424.03012
[4]Bialynicki-Birula, A., and H. Rasiowa, ``On the representation of quasi-boolean algebras,'' Bulletin Academie Polen. Sci. Cl., vol. 3 (1957), pp. 259--61.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR19,380b
Zentralblatt MATH: 0082.01403
[5]Dunn, J. M., ``Intensional algebras,'' pp. 180--206 in Entailment, edited by A. R. Anderson and N. D. Belnap Jr., Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0323.02030
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR406756
[6]Dunn, J. M., ``Relevance logic and entailment,'' pp. 117--224 in Handbook of Philosophical Logic III, edited by D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0875.03051
[7]Gupta, A., and N. Belnap, The Revision Theory of Truth, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR95f:03003
Zentralblatt MATH: 0858.03010
[8]Hermes, H., Einführung in die Verbandstheorie, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1967.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR36:3686
Zentralblatt MATH: 0153.33203
[9]Kalman, J. A., ``Lattices with involution,'' Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 87 (1958), 485--91.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR20:1641
Zentralblatt MATH: 0228.06003
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1993112
[10]Koppelberg, S., Handbook of Boolean Algebras, vol. 1, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR90k:06002
Zentralblatt MATH: 0671.06001
[11]Kripke, S. A., ``Outline of a theory of truth,'' The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 72 (1975), pp. 690--716.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0952.03513
[12]Leitgeb, H., Truth as Translation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, 1998.
[13]Martin, R. L., and P. W. Woodruff, ``On representing `True-in-$L$' in $L$,'' Philosophia, vol. 5 (1975), pp. 213--17.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0386.03001
[14]McGee, V., Truth, Vagueness and Paradox, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, 1991.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR92k:03004
Zentralblatt MATH: 0734.03001
[15]Monteiro, A., ``Matrices de Morgan caractèristiques pour le calcul propositionnel classique,'' An. Acad. Brasil, Ci., vol. 32 (1960), pp. 1--7.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR28:18
Zentralblatt MATH: 0094.00605
[16]Rescher, N., Many-valued Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0248.02023
[17]Rosser, J. B., Simplified Independence Proofs, Academic Press, New York, 1969.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR40:2536
Zentralblatt MATH: 0209.30502
[18]Tarski, A., ``Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen,'' Studia Philosophica, vol. 1 (1935), pp. 261--405.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0013.28903
[19]Tarski, A., ``The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics,'' Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 4 (1944), pp. 341--76.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0061.00807
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR10521
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2102968
[20]Visser, A., ``Four valued semantics and the Liar,'' Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 13 (1984), pp. 695--708.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR86f:03042
Zentralblatt MATH: 0546.03007
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF00453021
[21]Visser, A., ``Semantics and the Liar Paradox,'' pp. 617--706, in Handbook of Philosophical Logic IV, edited by D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1989.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0875.03030
[22]Woodruff, P. W., ``Paradox, truth and logic. Part 1: paradox and truth,'' Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 13 (1984), pp. 213--32.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR86d:03005d
Zentralblatt MATH: 0546.03006
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF00453016

2009 © Duke University Press