In this paper we study with proof-theoretic methods the function(al)s provably recursive relative to Ramsey's theorem for pairs and the cohesive principle (COH).
Our main result on COH is that the type 2 functionals provably recursive from
RCA0 + COH +
Π01-CP
are primitive recursive.
This also provides a uniform method to extract bounds from proofs that
use these principles. As a consequence we obtain a new proof of the
fact that WKL0+Π01-CP+COH is Π02-conservative over PRA.
Recent work of the first author showed that Π01-CP + COH is equivalent to a weak variant of the Bolzano—Weierstraß principle. This makes it possible to use our results to analyze not only combinatorial but also analytical proofs.
For Ramsey's theorem for pairs and two colors (RT22) we obtain the upper bounded that the type 2 functionals provable recursive relative to
RCA0+Σ02-IA + RT22 are in
T1. This is the fragment of Gödel's system T containing only type
1 recursion—roughly speaking it consists of functions of Ackermann
type. With this we also obtain a uniform method for the extraction of
T1-bounds from proofs that use
RT22. Moreover, this yields a new proof of the
fact that WKL0+Σ02-IA +
RT22 is
Π03-conservative
over RCA0+Σ02-IA.
The results are obtained in two steps: in the first step a term including Skolem functions for the above principles is extracted from a given proof. This is done using Gödel's functional interpretation. After this the term is normalized, such that only specific instances of the Skolem functions are used.
In the second step this term is interpreted using Π01-comprehension.
The comprehension is then eliminated in favor of induction using either
elimination of monotone Skolem functions (for COH) or Howard's
ordinal analysis of bar recursion (for RT22).
References
Jeremy Avigad Notes on $\Pi^1_1$-conservativity, $\omega$-submodels, and collection schema, Technical report, Carnegie Mellon Department of Philosophy,2002.
–––– Forcing in proof theory, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 10(2004), no. 3, pp. 305–333.
Jeremy Avigad and Solomon Feferman Gödel's functional (“Dialectica”) interpretation, Handbook of proof theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 137, North-Holland, Amsterdam,1998, pp. 337–405.
Jon Barwise and John Schlipf On recursively saturated models of arithmetic, Model theory and algebra $($A memorial tribute to Abraham Robinson$)$, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 498, Springer, Berlin,1975, pp. 42–55.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR409172
Marc Bezem Strongly majorizable functionals of finite type: a model for bar recursion containing discontinuous functionals, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 50(1985), no. 3, pp. 652–660.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR805674
Andrey Bovykin and Andreas Weiermann The strength of infinitary Ramseyan principles can be accessed by their densities, accepted for publication in Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, family http://logic.pdmi.ras.ru/ãndrey/research.html,2005.
Peter A. Cholak, Carl G. Jockusch, Jr., and Theodore A. Slaman On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 66(2001), no. 1, pp. 1–55.
–––– Corrigendum to: “On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs”, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 74(2009), no. 4, pp. 1438–1439.
Chitat Chong, Theodore Slaman, and Yue Yang $\Pi^0_1$-conservation of combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's theorem for pairs, preprint, available at family http://www.math.nus.edu.sg/\~chongct/COH_10.pdf.
Chitat T. Chong Nonstandard methods in Ramsey's theorem for pairs, Computational prospects of infinity. Part II. Presented talks, Lecture Notes Series. Institute for Mathematical Sciences. National University of Singapore, vol. 15, World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ,2008, pp. 47–57.
Harvey Friedman Some systems of second order arithmetic and their use, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians $($Vancouver, B.C., 1974$)$, vol. 1, Canadian Mathematics Congress, Montreal, Quebec,1975, pp. 235–242.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR429508
Robin O. Gandy Proofs of strong normalization, To H. B. Curry: essays on combinatory logic, lambda calculus and formalism, Academic Press, London,1980, pp. 457–477.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR592815
Kurt Gödel Über eine bisher noch nicht benützte Erweiterung des finiten Standpunktes, Dialectica, vol. 12(1958), pp. 280–287.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR102482
Petr Hájek and Pavel Pudlák Metamathematics of first-order arithmetic, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,1998.
Denis R. Hirschfeldt and Richard A. Shore Combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's theorem for pairs, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 72(2007), no. 1, pp. 171–206.
Jeffry L. Hirst Combinatorics in subsystems of second order arithmetic, Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University,1987.
William A. Howard Ordinal analysis of terms of finite type, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 45(1980), no. 3, pp. 493–504.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR583368
–––– Ordinal analysis of simple cases of bar recursion, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 46(1981), no. 1, pp. 17–30.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR604874
Carl Jockusch and Frank Stephan A cohesive set which is not high, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 39(1993), no. 4, pp. 515–530.
–––– Correction to: “A cohesive set which is not high”, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 43(1997), no. 4, p. 569.
Carl G. Jockusch, Jr. Ramsey's theorem and recursion theory, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 37(1972), pp. 268–280.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR376319
Carl G. Jockusch, Jr. and Robert I. Soare $\Pi ^{0}_{1}$ classes and degrees of theories, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 173(1972), pp. 33–56.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR316227
Stephen C. Kleene Countable functionals, Constructivity in mathematics: Proceedings of the colloquium held at Amsterdam, 1957 (A. Heyting, editor), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam,1959, pp. 81–100.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR112837
–––– Recursive functionals and quantifiers of finite types. I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 91(1959), pp. 1–52.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR102480
Ulrich Kohlenbach Effective bounds from ineffective proofs in analysis: an application of functional interpretation and majorization, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 57(1992), no. 4, pp. 1239–1273.
–––– Mathematically strong subsystems of analysis with low rate of growth of provably recursive functionals, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 36(1996), no. 1, pp. 31–71.
–––– Elimination of Skolem functions for monotone formulas in analysis, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 37(1998), pp. 363–390.
–––– On the arithmetical content of restricted forms of comprehension, choice and general uniform boundedness, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 95(1998), pp. 257–285.
–––– On the no-counterexample interpretation, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 64(1999), no. 4, pp. 1491–1511.
–––– On uniform weak König's lemma, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 114(2002), no. 1-3, pp. 103–116, Commemorative symposium dedicated to Anne S. Troelstra (Noordwijkerhout, 1999).
–––– Higher order reverse mathematics, Reverse mathematics 2001, Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 21, Association for Symbolic Logic, La Jolla, CA,2005, pp. 281–295.
–––– Applied proof theory: Proof interpretations and their use in mathematics, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer Verlag,2008.
Georg Kreisel Interpretation of analysis by means of constructive functionals of finite types, Constructivity in mathematics: Proceedings of the colloquium held at Amsterdam, 1957 (A. Heyting, editor), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam,1959, pp. 101–128.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR106838
Alexander Kreuzer and Ulrich Kohlenbach Ramsey's theorem for pairs and provably recursive functions, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 50(2009), no. 4, pp. 427–444 (2010).
Alexander P. Kreuzer Der Satz von Ramsey für Paare und beweisbar rekursive Funktionen, Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt,2009.
–––– The cohesive principle and the Bolzano–Weierstraß principle, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 57(2011), no. 3, pp. 292–298.
–––– Primitive recursion and the chain antichain principle, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 53(2012), no. 2, pp. 245–265.
Horst Luckhardt Extensional Gödel functional interpretation. A consistency proof of classical analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 306, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,1973.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR337512
Dag Normann Recursion on the countable functionals, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 811, Springer, Berlin,1980.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR583016
Charles Parsons Proof-theoretic analysis of restricted induction schemata, Meetings of the Association for Symbolic Logic (Gaisi Takeuti, editor), Association for Symbolic Logic,1971, abstract, p. 361.
–––– On $n$-quantifier induction, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 37(1972), pp. 466–482.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR325365
Pavol Safarik and Ulrich Kohlenbach On the computational content of the Bolzano–Weierstraß principle, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 56(2010), no. 5, pp. 508–532.
David Seetapun and Theodore A. Slaman On the strength of Ramsey's theorem, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 36(1995), no. 4, pp. 570–582, Special Issue: Models of arithmetic.
Richard A. Shore Reverse mathematics: the playground of logic, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 16(2010), no. 3, pp. 378–402.
Stephen G. Simpson Subsystems of second order arithmetic, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,1999.
Robert I. Soare Recursively enumerable sets and degrees, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,1987.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR882921
Ernst Specker Ramsey's theorem does not hold in recursive set theory, Logic Colloquium '69 $($Proceedings of the Summer School and Colloquium, Manchester, 1969$)$, North-Holland, Amsterdam,1971, pp. 439–442.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR278941
Clifford Spector Provably recursive functionals of analysis: a consistency proof of analysis by an extension of principles formulated in current intuitionistic mathematics, Proceedings of the Symposium in Pure Mathematics, vol. V, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I.,1962, pp. 1–27.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR154801
Thomas Streicher and Ulrich Kohlenbach Shoenfield is Gödel after Krivine, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 53(2007), no. 2, pp. 176–179.
Gaisi Takeuti Two applications of logic to mathematics, Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo,1978, Kanô Memorial Lectures, vol. 3, Publications of the Mathematical Society of Japan, no. 13.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR505474
Anne S. Troelstra (editor) Metamathematical investigation of intuitionistic arithmetic and analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 344, Springer-Verlag, Berlin,1973.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR325352
–––– Note on the fan theorem, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 39(1974), pp. 584–596.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR384494
Andreas Weiermann How is it that infinitary methods can be applied to finitary mathematics? Gödel's ${\rm T}$: a case study, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 63(1998), no. 4, pp. 1348–1370.