Woodin's axiom (*), bounded forcing axioms, and precipitous ideals on ω₁
Benjamin Claverie and Ralf Schindler
Source: J. Symbolic Logic Volume 77, Issue 2
(2012), 475-498.
Abstract
If the Bounded Proper Forcing Axiom BPFA holds, then Mouse Reflection holds at ℵ₂ with respect to all mouse operators up to the level of Woodin cardinals in the next ZFC—model. This yields that if Woodin's ℛmax axiom (*) holds, then BPFA implies that V is closed under the “Woodin-in-the-next-ZFC—model” operator. We also discuss stronger Mouse Reflection principles which we show to follow from strengthenings of BPFA, and we discuss the theory BPFA plus “NSω₁ is precipitous” and strengthenings thereof. Along the way, we answer a question of Baumgartner and Taylor, [2, Question 6.11].
First Page:
Show
Hide
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription
detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide
you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify
you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to
this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you
may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers
Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1333566633
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2178/jsl/1333566633
