Journal of Symbolic Logic

On the complexity of Gödel's proof predicate

Yijia Chen and Jörg Flum
Source: J. Symbolic Logic Volume 75, Issue 1 (2010), 239-254.

Abstract

The undecidability of first-order logic implies that there is no computable bound on the length of shortest proofs of valid sentences of first-order logic. Some valid sentences can only have quite long proofs. How hard is it to prove such “hard” valid sentences? The polynomial time tractability of this problem would imply the fixed-parameter tractability of the parameterized problem that, given a natural number n in unary as input and a first-order sentence φ as parameter, asks whether φ has a proof of length ≤ n. As the underlying classical problem has been considered by Gödel we denote this problem by p-Gödel. We show that p-Gödel is not fixed-parameter tractable if DTIME(hO(1)) ≠ NTIME(hO(1)) for all time constructible and increasing functions h. Moreover we analyze the complexity of the construction problem associated with p-Gödel.

First Page: Show Hide
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1264433918
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2178/jsl/1264433918
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2605891

References

H. Buhrman and J. M. Hitchcock, NP-hard sets are exponentially dense unless coNP $\subseteq$ NP/poly, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC'08), 2008, pp. 1--7.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2513482
S. Buss, On Gödel's theorems on lengths of proofs. II. Lower bounds for recognizing $k$ symbol provability, Feasible mathematics, II (P. Clote and J. Remmel, editors), Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1995, pp. 57--90.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1322274
Y. Chen and J. Flum, A logic for PTIME and a parameterized halting problem, Proceedings of the 24th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS '09), 2009, pp. 397--406.
A. Church, A note on the Entscheidungsproblem, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 1 (1936), pp. 40--41.
R. G. Downey and M. R. Fellows, Parameterized complexity, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1656112
H.-D. Ebbinghaus, J. Flum, and W. Thomas, Mathematical logic, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1278260
J. Flum and M. Grohe, Parameterized complexity theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2238686
K. Gödel, Collected works, vol. VI, Clarendon Press, 2003.
J.H. Lutz, The quantitative structure of exponential time, Complexity theory retrospective, II (L. A. Hemaspaandra and A. L. Selman, editors), Springer, New York, 1997, pp. 225--254.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1478176
Zentralblatt MATH: 0880.68044
E. Mayordomo, Almost every set in exponential time is P-bi-immune, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 136 (1994), no. 2, pp. 487--506.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1311218
Zentralblatt MATH: 0874.68161
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/0304-3975(94)00023-C

2012 © Association for Symbolic Logic

Journal of Symbolic Logic

Journal of Symbolic Logic