We prove that
if μ is a regular cardinal and ℛ is a μ-centered forcing poset,
then ℛ forces that (I[μ++])V generates
I[μ++] modulo clubs.
Using this result, we construct models in which the approachability
property fails at the successor of a singular cardinal.
We also construct models in which
the properties of being internally club and internally approachable
are distinct for sets of size the successor of a singular cardinal.
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription.
Read more about accessing full-text
References
J. Baumgartner, Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory, Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp. 1--59.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR823775
J. Cummings, Notes on singular cardinal combinatorics, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 46 (2005), no. 3, pp. 251--282.
M. Foreman and S. Todorčević, A new Löwenheim--Skolem theorem, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 357 (2005), pp. 1693--1715.
M. Foreman and H. Woodin, The G.C.H. can fail everywhere, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 133 (1991), pp. 1--35.
T. Jech, Set theory, second ed., Springer, 1997.
J. Krueger, Internally club and approachable, Advances in Mathematics, vol. 213 (2007), no. 2, pp. 734--740.
--------, A general Mitchell style iteration, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 54 (2008), no. 6, pp. 641--651.
--------, Internally club and approachable for larger structures, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 201 (2008), pp. 115--129.
--------, Some applications of mixed support iterations, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic,(to appear).
R. Laver, Making the supercompactness of $\kappa$ indestructible under $\kappa$-directed closed forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 29 (1978), no. 4, pp. 385--388.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR472529
M. Magidor, On the singular cardinals problem I, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 28 (1977), pp. 1--31.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR491183
--------, Changing cofinality of cardinals, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 99 (1978), pp. 61--71.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR465868
W. Mitchell, Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1972/73), pp. 21--46.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR313057
L.B. Radin, Adding closed cofinal sequences to large cardinals, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 22 (1982), pp. 243--261.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR670992
S. Shelah, On successors of singular cardinals, Logic colloquium 78 (M. Boffa, D. van Dalen, and K. McAloon, editors), North Holland Publishing Company, 1979, pp. 357--380.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR567680
--------, Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 31 (1991), no. 1, pp. 25--53.