We obtain an almost everywhere quantifier elimination for (the
noncritical fragment of) the logic with probability quantifiers,
introduced by the first author in [10]. This logic has quantifiers
like ∃≥ 3/4y, which says that “for at least 3/4 of all y”. These
results improve upon the 0-1 law for a fragment of this logic
obtained by Knyazev [11]. Our improvements are:
- We deal with the quantifier ∃≥ ry,
where y is a tuple of variables.
- We remove the closedness restriction, which requires that the variables in
y occur in all atomic subformulas of the quantifier scope.
- Instead of the unbiased measure where each model with universe n has the same
probability, we work with any measure generated by independent
atomic probabilities pR for each predicate symbol
R.
- We extend the results to parametric classes of finite models (for example,
the classes of bipartite graphs, undirected graphs, and oriented graphs).
- We extend the results to a natural (noncritical) fragment
of the infinitary logic with probability quantifiers.
- We allow each pR, as well as each r in the probability
quantifier (∃≥ ry), to depend on the size of the
universe.
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription.
Read more about accessing full-text
References
C. C. Chang and H. J. Keisler, Model theory, North Holland Elsevier, 1990.
A. Dawar and E. Grädel, Generalized quantifiers and 0--1 laws, Proceedings of the tenth annual IEEE symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 1995, pp. 54--64.
H-D. Ebbinghaus and J. Flum, Finite model theory, second ed., Springer-Verlag, 1999.
R. Fagin, Probabilities on finite models, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 41 (1976), pp. 17--21.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR476480
--------, Finite model theory---a personal perspective, Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 116 (1993), pp. 3--31.
Y. V. Glebskii, D. I. Kogan, M. I. Liogonki, and V. A. Talanov, Range and degree of realizability of formulas in the restricted predicate calculus, Cybernetics, vol. 5 (1969), pp. 142--154.
L. Hella, P. G. Kolaitis, and K. Luosto, Almost everywhere equivalence of logics in finite model theory, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 2 (1996), no. 4, pp. 422--443.
R. Kaila, On probabilistic elimination of generalized quantifiers, Random Structures and Algorithms, vol. 19 (2001), no. 1, pp. 1--36.
--------, On almost sure elimination of numerical quantifiers, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 13 (2003), no. 2, pp. 273--285.
H. J. Keisler, Hyperfinite model theory, Logic colloquium '76 (R. O. Gandy and J. M. E. Hyland, editors), North Holland, 1977.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR491155
V. V. Knyazev, Zero-one law for an extension of first-order predicate language, Kibernetika, (1990), no. 2, pp. 110--113.
P. G. Kolaitis and M. Y. Vardi, Infinitary logics and 0--1 laws, Information and Computation, vol. 98 (1992), pp. 258--294, special issue: selections from the fifth annual IEEE symposium on Logic in Computer Science.
T. Luczak and J. Spencer, When does the zero-one law hold?, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 4 (1991), no. 3, pp. 451--468.
W. Oberschelp, Asymptotic 0--1 laws in combinatorics, Combinatorial theory (D. Jungnickel, editor), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 969, Springer, 1982, pp. 276--292.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR692247
S. Shelah and J. Spencer, Zero-one laws for sparse random graphs, Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 1 (1988), pp. 97--115.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR924703