Journal of Symbolic Logic
previous :: next

The number of normal measures

Sy-David Friedman and Menachem Magidor

Source: J. Symbolic Logic Volume 74, Issue 3 (2009), 1069-1080.

Abstract

There have been numerous results showing that a measurable cardinal κ can carry exactly α normal measures in a model of GCH, where α is a cardinal at most κ++. Starting with just one measurable cardinal, we have [9] (for α=1), [10] (for α= κ++, the maximum possible) and [1] (for α=κ⁺, after collapsing κ++). In addition, under stronger large cardinal hypotheses, one can handle the remaining cases: [12] (starting with a measurable cardinal of Mitchell order α), [2] (as in [12], but where κ is the least measurable cardinal and α is less than κ, starting with a measurable of high Mitchell order) and [11] (as in [12], but where κ is the least measurable cardinal, starting with an assumption weaker than a measurable cardinal of Mitchell order 2). In this article we treat all cases by a uniform argument, starting with only one measurable cardinal and applying a cofinality-preserving forcing. The proof uses κ-Sacks forcing and the “tuning fork” technique of [8]. In addition, we explore the possibilities for the number of normal measures on a cardinal at which the GCH fails.

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jsl/1245158100
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2178/jsl/1245158100
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 05609405

References

A. Apter, J. Cummings, and J. Hamkins, Large cardinals with few measures, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 135 (2007), no. 7.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2299507
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08786-2
S. Baldwin, The $\vartriangleleft$-ordering on normal ultrafilters, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 51 (1985), no. 4.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR820124
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2273982
O. Ben-Neria, Magidor forcing and the number of normal measures, Master's thesis, Tel Aviv University, 2008.
J. Cummings, Possible behaviours for the Mitchell ordering, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 65 (1993).
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1257466
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/0168-0072(93)90034-B
A. Dodd, The core model, London Math Society Lecture Notes, vol. 61, 1982.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR652253
S. Friedman, Coding over a measurable cardinal, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 54 (1989), no. 4, pp. 1145--1159.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1026594
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2274810
--------, Fine structure and class forcing, de Gruyter, 2000.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1780138
S. Friedman and K. Thompson, Perfect trees and elementary embeddings, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 73 (2008), no. 3, pp. 906--918.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2444275
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2178/jsl/1230396754
Project Euclid: euclid.jsl/1230396754
K. Kunen, Some applications of iterated ultrapowers in set theory, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (1970).
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR277346
K. Kunen and J. Paris, Boolean extensions and measurable cardinals, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 2 (1970/1971), no. 4, pp. 359--377.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR277381
J. Leaning, Disassociated indiscernibles, Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida, 1999, (also see [omer?]).
W. Mitchell, Sets constructible from sequences of ultrafilters, Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 39 (1974), no. 1.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR344123
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2272343
M. Zeman, Inner models and large cardinals, de Gruyter Series in Logic and Its Applications, vol. 5, 2002.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1876087
previous :: next

2009 © Association for Symbolic Logic