Journal of Applied Probability

A Markov chain analysis of genetic algorithms: large deviation principle approach

Joe Suzuki
Source: J. Appl. Probab. Volume 47, Number 4 (2010), 967-975.

Abstract

In this paper we prove that the stationary distribution of populations in genetic algorithms focuses on the uniform population with the highest fitness value as the selective pressure goes to ∞ and the mutation probability goes to 0. The obtained sufficient condition is based on the work of Albuquerque and Mazza (2000), who, following Cerf (1998), applied the large deviation principle approach (Freidlin-Wentzell theory) to the Markov chain of genetic algorithms. The sufficient condition is more general than that of Albuquerque and Mazza, and covers a set of parameters which were not found by Cerf.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 65C40
Secondary Subjects: 65C50
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jap/1294170512
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1239/jap/1294170512
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 05835861
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2752897

References

Albuquerque, P. and Mazza, C. (2001). Mutation-selection algorithms: A large deviation approach. In Foundations of Genetic Algorithms-6, eds W. N. Martin and W. M. Spears, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp. 227–240.
Catoni, O. (1997). Simulated annealing algorithms and Markov chains with rare transitions. Séminaire de Probabilités XXXIII. Lecture Notes Math. 709, Springer, Berlin, pp. 69–119.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1767994
Zentralblatt MATH: 0944.90053
Cerf, R. (1996). The dynamics of mutation-selection algorithms with large population sizes. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Prob. Statist. 32, 455–508.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1411269
Zentralblatt MATH: 0861.60038
Cerf, R. (1998). Asymptotic convergence of genetic algorithms. Adv. Appl. Prob. 30, 521–550.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1642852
Zentralblatt MATH: 0911.60018
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1239/aap/1035228082
Project Euclid: euclid.aap/1035228082
Davis, T. E. and Principe, J. C. (1991). A simulated annealing-like convergence theory for the simple genetic algorithm. In Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Genetic Algorithms, eds R. K. Belew and L. B. Booker, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, pp. 174–181.
De Silva, U. C. and Suzuki, J. (1995). On the stationary distribution of GAs with positive crossover probability. In Proc. Genetic Evolutionary Comput. Conf. (GECCO 2005), ACM, Washington, DC, pp. 1147–1151.
Francois, O. (2002). Global optimization with exploration/selection algorithms and simulated annealing. Ann. Appl. Prob. 12, pp. 248–271.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1890064
Zentralblatt MATH: 1012.60066
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoap/1015961163
Project Euclid: euclid.aoap/1015961163
Freidlin, M. I. and Wentzell, A. D. (1984). Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR722136
Goldberg, D. E. (1988) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Rigal L. and Truffet L. (2007). A new genetic algorithm specifically based on mutation and selection. Adv. Appl. Prob. 39, 141–161.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2307875
Zentralblatt MATH: 1112.60019
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1239/aap/1175266473
Project Euclid: euclid.aap/1175266473
Suzuki, J. (1995). A Markov chain analysis of simple genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 25, 655–659.
Suzuki, J. (1998). A further result on the Markov chain model of genetic algorithms and its application to a simulated annealing-like strategy. IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernetics 28, 95–102.

2013 © Applied Probability Trust

Journal of Applied Probability

Journal of Applied Probability