Journal of Applied Probability

Does waste recycling really improve the multi-proposal Metropolis--Hastings algorithm? An analysis based on control variates

Jean-Françcois Delmas and Benjamin Jourdain
Source: J. Appl. Probab. Volume 46, Number 4 (2009), 938-959.

Abstract

The waste-recycling Monte Carlo (WRMC) algorithm introduced by physicists is a modification of the (multi-proposal) Metropolis--Hastings algorithm, which makes use of all the proposals in the empirical mean, whereas the standard (multi-proposal) Metropolis--Hastings algorithm uses only the accepted proposals. In this paper we extend the WRMC algorithm to a general control variate technique and exhibit the optimal choice of the control variate in terms of the asymptotic variance. We also give an example which shows that, in contradiction to the intuition of physicists, the WRMC algorithm can have an asymptotic variance larger than that of the Metropolis--Hastings algorithm. However, in the particular case of the Metropolis--Hastings algorithm called the Boltzmann algorithm, we prove that the WRMC algorithm is asymptotically better than the Metropolis--Hastings algorithm. This last property is also true for the multi-proposal Metropolis--Hastings algorithm. In this last framework we consider a linear parametric generalization of WRMC, and we propose an estimator of the explicit optimal parameter using the proposals.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 60F05, 60J10, 60J22, 65C40, 82B80
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jap/1261670681
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1239/jap/1261670681
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 05665448
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2582699

References

Andersen, H. C. and Diaconis, P. (2007). Hit and run as a unifying device. J. Soc. Fran. Stat. 148, 5--28.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2502361
Atchadé, Y. F. and Perron, F. (2005). Improving on the independent Metropolis--Hastings algorithm. Statistica Sinica 15, 3--18.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2125717
Zentralblatt MATH: 1059.62086
Athènes, M. (2007). Web ensemble averages for retrieving relevant information from rejected Monte Carlo moves. Europ. Phys. J. B 58, 83--95.
Ceperley, D., Chester, G. V. and Kalos, M. H. (1977). Monte Carlo simulation of a many fermion study. Phys. Rev. B 16, 3081--3099.
Douc, R. and Robert, C. P. (2009). A vanilla Rao--Blackwellisation of Metropolis--Hastings algorithms. Preprint. Available at http://arXiv.org/0904.2144.
Duflo, M. (1997). Random Iterative Models (Appl. Math. 34). Springer, Berlin.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1485774
Zentralblatt MATH: 0868.62069
Frenkel, D. (2004). Speed-up of Monte Carlo simulations by sampling of rejected states. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17571--17575.
Frenkel, D. (2006). Waste-recycling Monte Carlo. In Computer Simulations in Condensed Matter: From Materials to Chemical Biology (Lecture Notes Phys. 703), Springer, Berlin, pp. 127--137.
Meyn, S. P. and Tweedie, R. L. (1993). Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability. Springer, London.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1287609
Munos, R. (2006). Geometric variance reduction in Markov chains: application to value function and gradient estimation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 413--427.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2274373
Peskun, P. H. (1973). Optimum Monte-Carlo sampling using Markov chains. Biometrika 60, 607--612.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR362823
Zentralblatt MATH: 0271.62041
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/60.3.607
Robert, C. P. and Casella, G. (1999). Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1707311

2012 © Applied Probability Trust

Journal of Applied Probability

Journal of Applied Probability