Duke Mathematical Journal

The work of John F. Nash Jr. in game theory: Nobel Seminar, 8 December 1994

Harold W. Kuhn, John C. Harsanyi, Reinhard Selten, Jörgen W. Weibull, Eric van Damme, John F. Nash, Jr., and Peter Hammerstein
Source: Duke Math. J. Volume 81, Number 1 (1995), 1-29.
First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 90-03
Secondary Subjects: 01A70, 90Dxx
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.dmj/1077245457
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR1381966
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 0849.01037
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-95-08102-2

References

[1] K. Arrow and G. Debreu, Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy, Econometrica 22 (1954), 265–290.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR17,985e
Zentralblatt MATH: 0055.38007
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1907353
[2] R. J. Aumann, What is game theory trying to accomplish? Frontiers of economics (Sannäs, 1983) eds. K. Arrow and S. Honkapohja, Blackwell, Oxford, 1985, pp. 28–99.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR906458
[3] R. J. Aumann, Game theory, The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics eds. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, Stockton Press, New York, 1987, pp. 460–482.
[4] R. Aumann and A. Brandenburger, Epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium, working paper 91-042, Harvard Business School.
[5] K. Binmore, A. Rubinstein, and A. Wolinsky, The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling, Rand J. Econom. 17 (1986), no. 2, 176–188.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR87f:90029
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2555382
[6] J. Björnerstedt and J. Weibull, “Nash equilibrium and evolution by imitation” in The Rational Foundations of Economic Behavior, ed. by K. Arrow et al., Macmillan, New York, forthcoming.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1261764
Zentralblatt MATH: 0791.90076
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1006/game.1994.1015
[7] I. Bomze, Noncooperative two-person games in biology: a classification, Internat. J. Game Theory 15 (1986), no. 1, 31–57.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR87g:90141
Zentralblatt MATH: 0594.90098
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF01769275
[8] H. Carlsson and E. van Damme, Equilibrium selection in stag hunt games, Frontiers of Game Theory eds. K. Binmore and A. Kirman, Mass. Inst. of Technology Press, Cambridge, 1993, pp. 237–253.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1259311
Zentralblatt MATH: 0807.90138
[9] G. Debreu, Economic theory in the mathematical mode, in Les Prix Nobel 1983, reprinted in Amer. Econom. Rev. 74 (1984), 267–278.
[10] I. Eshel and M. W. Feldman, Initial increase of new mutants and some continuity properties of ESS in two locus systems, Amer. Naturalist 124 (1984), 631–640.
[11] R. A. Fisher, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1930.
Zentralblatt MATH: 56.1106.13
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1785121
[12] M. M. Flood, Some experimental games, Management Science 5 (1958), 5–26.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR20:4449
Zentralblatt MATH: 0995.91505
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1287/mnsc.5.1.5
[13] M. Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1953.
[14] J. B. S. Haldane, The Causes of Evolution, Longman, London, 1932.
[15] P. Hammerstein, Darwinian adaptation, population genetics and the streetcar theory of evolution, J. Math. Biol., in press.
[16] P. Hammerstein and R. Selten, Game theory and evolutionary biology, Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Vol. 2 eds. R. J. Aumann and S. Hart, Handbooks in Econom., vol. 11, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994, pp. 929–993.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1313224
Zentralblatt MATH: 0925.90088
[17] J. C. Harsanyi, Approaches to the bargaining problem before and after the theory of games: A critical discussion of Zeuthen's, Hicks', and Nash's theories, Econometrica 24 (1956), 144–157.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR18,367b
Zentralblatt MATH: 0071.14008
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1905748
[18] J. C. Harsanyi, A simplified bargaining model for the $n$-person cooperative game, Internat. Econom. Rev. 4 (1963), 194–220.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0118.15103
[19]1 J. C. Harsanyi, Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. I. The basic model, Management Sci. 14 (1967), 159–182.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR39:7953
Zentralblatt MATH: 0207.51102
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1287/mnsc.14.3.159
[19]2 J. C. Harsanyi, Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. II. Bayesian equilibrium points, Management Sci. 14 (1968), 320–334.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR39:7954
Zentralblatt MATH: 0177.48402
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1287/mnsc.14.5.320
[19]3 J. C. Harsanyi, Games with incomplete information played by “Bayesian” players. III. The basic probability distribution of the game, Management Sci. 14 (1968), 486–502.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR39:7955
Zentralblatt MATH: 0177.48501
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1287/mnsc.14.7.486
[20] J. C. Harsanyi, Games with randomly disturbed payoffs: a new rationale for mixed-strategy equilibrium points, Internat. J. Game Theory 2 (1973), no. 1, 1–23.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR48:1720
Zentralblatt MATH: 0255.90084
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF01737554
[21] J. C. Harsanyi, An equilibrium-point interpretation of stable sets and a proposed alternative definition, Management Sci. 20 (1973/74), 1472–1495.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR50:15941
Zentralblatt MATH: 0335.90063
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1287/mnsc.20.11.1472
[22] J. C. Harsanyi and R. Selten, A generalized Nash solution for two-person bargaining games with incomplete information, Management Sci. 18 (1971/72), P80–P106.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR45:4838
Zentralblatt MATH: 0262.90087
[23] J. C. Harsanyi and R. Selten, A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games, Mass Inst. of Technology Press, Cambridge, 1988.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR89j:90285
Zentralblatt MATH: 0693.90098
[24] J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund, The Theory of Evolution and Dynamical Systems, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol. 7, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR91h:92019
Zentralblatt MATH: 0678.92010
[25] G. K. Kalisch, J. W. Milnor, J. F. Nash, Jr., and E. D. Nering, Some experimental $n$-person games, Decision Processes eds. R. M. Thrall, C. H. Coombs, and R. L. Davis, Wiley, New York, 1954, pp. 301–327.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0058.13904
[26] S. Karlin, General two-locus selection models: some objectives, results and interpretations, Theoret. Population Biology 7 (1975), 364–398.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR52:5080
Zentralblatt MATH: 0315.92006
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/0040-5809(75)90025-8
[27] E. Kohlberg and J.-F. Mertens, On the strategic stability of equilibria, Econometrica 54 (1986), no. 5, 1003–1037.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR88h:90043
Zentralblatt MATH: 0616.90103
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1912320
[28] R. Leonard, Reading Cournot, reading Nash: The creation and stabilization of the Nash equilibrium, Econom. J. 104 (1994), 492–511.
[29] R. Leonard, From parlor games to social science: Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the creation of game theory, 1928–1944, J. Econom. Literature, in press.
[30] J. Maynard Smith, Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0526.90102
[31] J. Maynard Smith and G. R. Price, The logic of animal conflict, Nature 246 (1973), 15–18.
[32] P. A. P. Moran, On the nonexistence of adaptive topographies, Ann. Human Genetics 27 (1964), 338–343.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0122.15702
[33] O. Morgenstern, The collaboration between Oskar Morgenstern and John Von Neumann on the theory of games, J. Econom. Literature 14 (1976), 805–816.
[34] J. H. Nachbar, “Evolutionary” selection dynamics in games: convergence and limit properties, Internat. J. Game Theory 19 (1990), no. 1, 59–89.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR91c:90127
Zentralblatt MATH: 0699.90109
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF01753708
[35] J. F. Nash, Jr., Equilibrium points in $n$-person games, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 36 (1950), 48–49.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR11,192c
Zentralblatt MATH: 0036.01104
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
[36] J. F. Nash, Jr., Non-cooperative games, Ph.D. thesis, Mathematics Department, Princeton University, 1950.
[37] J. F. Nash, Jr., The bargaining problem, Econometrica 18 (1950), 155–162.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR12,40a
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1907266
[38] J. F. Nash, Jr., Non-cooperative games, Ann. of Math. (2) 54 (1951), 286–295.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR13,261g
Zentralblatt MATH: 0045.08202
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1969529
[39] J. F. Nash, Jr., Two-person cooperative games, Econometrica 21 (1953), 128–140.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR14,778i
Zentralblatt MATH: 0050.14102
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1906951
[40] J. Robinson, An iterative method of solving a game, Ann. of Math. (2) 54 (1951), 296–301.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR13,261e
Zentralblatt MATH: 0045.08203
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1969530
[41] A. E. Roth, The early history of experimental economics, J. Hist. Econom. Thought 15 (1993), 184–209.
[42] A. Rubinstein, Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model, Econometrica 50 (1982), no. 1, 97–109.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR84e:90111
Zentralblatt MATH: 0474.90092
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/1912531
[43] A. Rubinstein, Z. Safra, and W. Thomson, On the interpretation of the Nash bargaining solution and its extension to non-expected utility preferences, Econometrica 60 (1992), no. 5, 1171–1186.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR93k:90013
Zentralblatt MATH: 0767.90094
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2951543
[44] T. C. Schelling, The Strategy of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1960.
[45] R. Selten, Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit, Z. Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 121 (1965), 301–324 and 667–689.
[46] R. Selten, Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games, Internat. J. Game Theory 4 (1975), no. issue 1-2, 25–55.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR52:16688
Zentralblatt MATH: 0312.90072
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF01766400
[47] R. Selten, In search of a better understanding of economic behavior, The Makers of Modern Economics, Vol. I ed. A. Heertje, Harvester Wheatscheaf, Hertfordshire, 1993, pp. 155–139.
[48] P. Taylor, Evolutionarily stable strategies with two types of player, J. Appl. Probab. 16 (1979), no. 1, 76–83.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR80b:92041
Zentralblatt MATH: 0398.90120
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/3213376
[49] P. Taylor and L. Jonker, Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics, Math. Biosci. 40 (1978), no. 1-2, 145–156.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR58:9351
Zentralblatt MATH: 0395.90118
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9
[50] E. van Damme, Stability and Perfection of Nash Equilibria, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR89f:90205
Zentralblatt MATH: 0696.90087
[51] J. Von Neumann, Zur Theorie der Gesellschaftsspiele, Math. Ann. 100 (1928), 295–320.
Zentralblatt MATH: 54.0543.02
[52] J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1944.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR6,235k
Zentralblatt MATH: 0063.05930
[53] J. Weibull, The “as if” approach to game theory: Three positive results and four obstacles, European Econom. Rev. 38 (1994), 868–882.
[54] J. Weibull, Evolutionary Game Theory, Mass. Inst. of Technology Press, Cambridge, forthcoming.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1347921
Zentralblatt MATH: 0879.90206
[55] S. Wright, Evolution in Mendelian populations, Genetics 16 (1931), 97–159.

2012 © Duke University Press

Duke Mathematical Journal

Duke Mathematical Journal

Turn MathJax Off
What is MathJax?