Bulletin of Symbolic Logic

Vaught's theorem on axiomatizability by a scheme

Albert Visser
Source: Bull. Symbolic Logic Volume 18, Issue 3 (2012), 382-402.

Abstract

In his 1967 paper Vaught used an ingenious argument to show that every recursively enumerable first order theory that directly interprets the weak system VS of set theory is axiomatizable by a scheme. In this paper we establish a strengthening of Vaught's theorem by weakening the hypothesis of direct interpretability of VS to direct interpretability of the finitely axiomatized fragment VS2 of VS. This improvement significantly increases the scope of the original result, since VS is essentially undecidable, but VS2 has decidable extensions. We also explore the ramifications of our work on finite axiomatizability of schemes in the presence of suitable comprehension principles.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 03B10, 03B30, 03F25
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bsl/1344861888
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2178/bsl/1344861888
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 06083933
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2987522


2013 © Association for Symbolic Logic

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic

Turn MathJax Off
What is MathJax?