What does it take to prove Fermat's Last Theorem? Grothendieck and the logic of number theory
Colin McLarty
Source: Bull. Symbolic Logic Volume 16, Issue 3
(2010), 359-377.
Abstract
This paper explores the set theoretic assumptions used in the current published proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, how these assumptions figure in the methods Wiles uses, and the currently known prospects for a proof using weaker assumptions.
First Page:
Show
Hide
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription
detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide
you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify
you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to
this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you
may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers
