Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics

On improved estimation for importance sampling

David Firth
Source: Braz. J. Probab. Stat. Volume 25, Number 3 (2011), 437-443.

Abstract

The standard estimator used in conjunction with importance sampling in Monte Carlo integration is unbiased but inefficient. An alternative estimator is discussed, based on the idea of a difference estimator, which is asymptotically optimal. The improved estimator uses the importance weight as a control variate, as previously studied by Hesterberg (Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University (1988); Technometrics 37 (1995) 185–194; Statistics and Computing 6 (1996) 147–157); it is routinely available and can deliver substantial additional variance reduction. Finite-sample performance is illustrated in a sequential testing example. Connections are made with methods from the survey-sampling literature.

First Page: Show Hide
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bjps/1313973403
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/11-BJPS155
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2832895
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 05963753

References

Evans, M. and Swartz, T. B. (2000)., Approximating Integrals via Monte Carlo and Deterministic Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1859163
Zentralblatt MATH: 0958.65009
Firth, D. and Bennett, K. E. (1998). Robust models in probability sampling (with discussion)., Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 60 3–21.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1625672
Zentralblatt MATH: 0910.62009
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00105
Hammersley, J. M. and Handscomb, D. C. (1964)., Monte Carlo Methods. London: Chapman and Hall.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR223065
Hesterberg, T. C. (1988). Advances in importance sampling. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford, Univ.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2637036
Hesterberg, T. C. (1995). Weighted average importance sampling and defensive mixture distributions., Technometrics 37 185–194.
Hesterberg, T. C. (1996). Control variates and importance sampling for efficient bootstrap simulations., Statistics and Computing 6 147–157.
Ripley, B. D. (1987)., Stochastic Simulation. New York: Wiley.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR875224
Robert, C. P. and Casella, G. (2004)., Monte Carlo Statistical Methods, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2080278
Särndal, C. E., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. H. (1992)., Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1140409
Siegmund, D. (1976). Importance sampling in the Monte Carlo study of sequential tests., Annals of Statistics 25 673–684.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR418369
Zentralblatt MATH: 0353.62044
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176343541
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176343541
Van Deusen, P. C. (1995). Difference sampling as an alternative to importance sampling., Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25 487–490.

2013 © Brazilian Statistical Association

Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics

Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics

Turn MathJax Off
What is MathJax?