The Annals of Statistics

Adaptive estimation of stationary Gaussian fields

Nicolas Verzelen
Source: Ann. Statist. Volume 38, Number 3 (2010), 1363-1402.

Abstract

We study the nonparametric covariance estimation of a stationary Gaussian field X observed on a regular lattice. In the time series setting, some procedures like AIC are proved to achieve optimal model selection among autoregressive models. However, there exists no such equivalent results of adaptivity in a spatial setting. By considering collections of Gaussian Markov random fields (GMRF) as approximation sets for the distribution of X, we introduce a novel model selection procedure for spatial fields. For all neighborhoods m in a given collection $\mathcal{M}$, this procedure first amounts to computing a covariance estimator of X within the GMRFs of neighborhood m. Then it selects a neighborhood ̂m by applying a penalization strategy. The so-defined method satisfies a nonasymptotic oracle-type inequality. If X is a GMRF, the procedure is also minimax adaptive to the sparsity of its neighborhood. More generally, the procedure is adaptive to the rate of approximation of the true distribution by GMRFs with growing neighborhoods.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 62H11
Secondary Subjects: 62M40
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1268056620
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/09-AOS751
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 05712425
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2662346

References

[1] Aykroyd, R. (1998). Bayesian estimation for homogeneous and inhomogeneous Gaussian random fields. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 20 533–539.
[2] Besag, J. E. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. Statistica 24 179–195.
[3] Besag, J. E. (1977). Efficiency of pseudolikelihood estimation for simple Gaussian fields. Biometrika 64 616–618.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR494640
Zentralblatt MATH: 0372.62067
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/64.3.616
[4] Besag, J. E. and Kooperberg, C. (1995). On conditional and intrinsic autoregressions. Biometrika 82 733–746.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1380811
Zentralblatt MATH: 0899.62123
[5] Besag, J. E. and Moran, P. A. P. (1975). On the estimation and testing of spatial interaction in Gaussian lattice processes. Biometrika 62 555–562.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR391451
Zentralblatt MATH: 0388.62082
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/62.3.555
[6] Birgé, L. and Massart, P. (2001). Gaussian model selection. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 3 203–268.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1848946
Zentralblatt MATH: 1037.62001
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s100970100031
[7] Birgé, L. and Massart, P. (2007). Minimal penalties for Gaussian model selection. Probab. Theory Related Fields 138 33–73.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2288064
Zentralblatt MATH: 1112.62082
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s00440-006-0011-8
[8] Boucheron, S., Bousquet, O., Lugosi, G. and Massart, P. (2005). Moment inequalities for functions of independent random variables. Ann. Probab. 33 514–560.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2123200
Zentralblatt MATH: 1074.60018
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009117904000000856
Project Euclid: euclid.aop/1109868590
[9] Brockwell, P. J. and Davis, R. A. (1991). Time Series: Theory and Methods, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1093459
[10] Cressie, N. A. C. (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1239641
Zentralblatt MATH: 0799.62002
[11] Cressie, N. A. C. and Verzelen, N. (2008). Conditional-mean least-squares of Gaussian Markov random fields to Gaussian fields. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 52 2794–2807.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2419542
[12] Crouse, M., Nowak, R. and Baraniuk, R. (1998). Wavelet-based statistical signal processing using hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 46 886–902.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1665651
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1109/78.668544
[13] Dass, S. C. and Nair, V. N. (2003). Edge detection, spatial smoothing, and image reconstruction with partially observed multivariate data. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 98 77–89.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1977200
Zentralblatt MATH: 1047.62087
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/01621450338861911
[14] Edwards, D. (2000). Introduction to Graphical Modelling, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1880319
[15] Gray, R. (2006). Toeplitz and Circulant Matrices: A Review, rev. ed. Now Publishers, Norwell, MA.
[16] Guyon, X. (1987). Estimation d’un champ par pseudo-vraisemblance conditionnelle: Étude asymptotique et application au cas Markovien. In Spatial processes and spatial time series analysis (Brussels, 1985). Travaux Rech. 11 15–62. Publ. Fac. Univ. Saint-Louis, Brussels.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR947996
[17] Guyon, X. (1995). Random Fields on a Network. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1344683
Zentralblatt MATH: 0839.60003
[18] Guyon, X. and Yao, J. (1999). On the underfitting and overfitting sets of models chosen by order selection criteria. J. Multivariate Anal. 70 221–249.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1711522
Zentralblatt MATH: 1070.62516
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1006/jmva.1999.1828
[19] Hall, P., Fisher, N. and Hoffmann, B. (1994). On the nonparametric estimation of covariance functions. Ann. Statist. 22 2115–2134.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1329185
Zentralblatt MATH: 0828.62036
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176325774
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176325774
[20] Hurvich, C. and Tsai, C.-L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76 297–307.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1016020
Zentralblatt MATH: 0669.62085
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/76.2.297
[21] Im, H., Stein, M. and Zhu, Z. (2007). Semiparametric estimation of spectral density with irregular observations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 102 726–735.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2381049
Zentralblatt MATH: 1172.62324
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/016214507000000220
[22] Kashyap, R. and Chellapa, R. (1984). Estimation and choice of neighbors in spatial-interaction models of images. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 29 60–72.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR781270
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1109/TIT.1984.1056955
[23] Lakshmanan, S. and Derin, H. (1993). Valid parameter space for 2-D Gaussian Markov random fields. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 39 703–709.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1224361
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1109/18.212307
[24] Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical Models. Oxford Statistical Science Series 17. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1419991
[25] Massart, P. (2007). Concentration Inequalities and Model Selection. Lecture Notes in Math. 1896. Springer, Berlin.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2319879
Zentralblatt MATH: 1170.60006
[26] McQuarrie, A. D. R. and Tsai, C.-L. (1998). Regression and Time Series Model Selection. World Scientific, River Edge, NJ.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1641582
Zentralblatt MATH: 0907.62095
[27] Portilla, J., Strela, V., Wainwright, M. J. and Simoncelli, E. P. (2003). Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 12 1338–1351.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2026777
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.818640
[28] Rothman, A. J., Bickel, P. J., Levina, E. and Zhu, J. (2008). Sparse permutation invariant covariance estimation. Electron. J. Stat. 2 494–515.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2417391
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/08-EJS176
Project Euclid: euclid.ejs/1214491853
[29] Rue, H. and Held, L. (2005). Gaussian Markov Random Fields: Theory and Applications. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 104. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2130347
[30] Rue, H., Martino, S. and Chopin, N. (2009). Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 71 319–392.
[31] Rue, H. and Tjelmeland, H. (2002). Fitting Gaussian Markov random fields to Gaussian fields. Scand. J. Statist. 29 31–49.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1894379
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/1467-9469.00058
[32] Shibata, R. (1980). Asymptotically efficient selection of the order of the model for estimating parameters of a linear process. Ann. Statist. 8 147–164.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR557560
Zentralblatt MATH: 0425.62069
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176344897
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176344897
[33] Song, H.-R., Fuentes, M. and Ghosh, S. (2008). A comparative study of Gaussian geostatistical models and Gaussian Markov random field models. J. Multivariate Anal. 99 1681–1697.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2526171
Zentralblatt MATH: 1142.86309
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2008.01.012
[34] Stein, M. L. (1999). Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1697409
[35] Talagrand, M. (1996). New concentration inequalities in product spaces. Invent. Math. 126 505–563.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1419006
Zentralblatt MATH: 0893.60001
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s002220050108
[36] Verzelen, N. (2009). Technical Appendix to “Adaptive estimation of stationary Gaussian fields.” Available at arXiv:0908.4586.
[37] Verzelen, N. (2010). Data-driven neighborhood selection of a Gaussian field. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. To appear.
[38] Yu, B. (1997). Assouad, Fano and Le Cam. In Festschrift for Lucien Le Cam 423–435. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1462963
Zentralblatt MATH: 0896.62032

2013 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics

The Annals of Statistics

The Annals of Statistics

Turn MathJax Off
What is MathJax?