The Annals of Statistics

Invariant P-values for model checking

Michael Evans and Gun Ho Jang
Source: Ann. Statist. Volume 38, Number 1 (2010), 512-525.

Abstract

P-values have been the focus of considerable criticism based on various considerations. Still, the P-value represents one of the most commonly used statistical tools. When assessing the suitability of a single hypothesized distribution, it is not clear that there is a better choice for a measure of surprise. This paper is concerned with the definition of appropriate model-based P-values for model checking.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 62F99
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1262271622
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/09-AOS727
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 1181.62030
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2589329

References

[1] Bayarri, M. J. and Berger, J. O. (2000). P-values for composite null models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 95 1127–1142, 1157–1170. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1804239
Zentralblatt MATH: 1004.62022
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2669749
[2] Bayarri, M. J. and Castellanos, M. E. (2007). Bayesian checking of the second levels of hierarchical models. Statist. Sci. 22 322–343. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2416808
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/07-STS235
Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1199285031
[3] Berger, J. O. and Delampady, M. (1987). Testing precise hypotheses. Statist. Sci. 2 317–352. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR920141
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/ss/1177013238
Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1177013238
[4] Berger, J. O. and Sellke, T. (1987). Testing a point null hypothesis: Irreconcilability of P-values and evidence. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 82 112–139. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR883340
Zentralblatt MATH: 0612.62022
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2289131
[5] Bernardo, J. M. and Smith, A. F. M. (1994). Bayesian Theory. Wiley, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1274699
[6] Evans, M. and Jang, G.-H. (2008). Invariant P-values for model checking and checking for prior-data conflict. Techincal Report 0803, Dept. Statistics, Univ. Toronto.
[7] Fraser, D. A. S. (1979). Inference and Linear Models. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR535612
Zentralblatt MATH: 0455.62052
[8] Gelman, A., Meng, X.-L. and Stern, H. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Statist. Sinica 6 733–807. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1422404
Zentralblatt MATH: 0859.62028
[9] Hall, P. and Selinger, B. (1986). Statistical significance: Balancing evidence against doubt. Austral. J. Statist. 28 354–370.
[10] Loomis, L. H. and Sternberg, S. (1968). Advanced Calculus. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR227327
[11] Meng, X.-L. (1994). Posterior predictive p-values. Ann. Statist. 22 1142–1160.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1311969
Zentralblatt MATH: 0820.62027
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176325622
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176325622
[12] Morrison, D. E. and Henkel, R. E. (1970). The Significance Test Controversy—A Reader. Aldine Publishing, Chicago.
[13] Royall, R. M. (1997). Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 71. Chapman and Hall, London.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1629481
[14] Rudin, W. (1974). Real and Complex Analysis, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR344043
[15] Schervish, M. J. (1996). P-values: What they are and what they are not. Amer. Statist. 50 203–206.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1422069
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2684655
[16] Tjur, T. (1974). Conditional Probability Distributions. Lecture Notes 2. Univ. Copenhagen, Copenhagen.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR345151
Zentralblatt MATH: 0316.60001

2012 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics

The Annals of Statistics

The Annals of Statistics