The Annals of Statistics

Characterization of Bayes procedures for multiple endpoint problems and inadmissibility of the step-up procedure

Arthur Cohen and Harold B. Sackrowitz
Source: Ann. Statist. Volume 33, Number 1 (2005), 145-158.

Abstract

The problem of multiple endpoint testing for k endpoints is treated as a 2k finite action problem. The loss function chosen is a vector loss function consisting of two components. The two components lead to a vector risk. One component of the vector risk is the false rejection rate (FRR), that is, the expected number of false rejections. The other component is the false acceptance rate (FAR), that is, the expected number of acceptances for which the corresponding null hypothesis is false. This loss function is more stringent than the positive linear combination loss function of Lehmann [Ann. Math. Statist. 28 (1957) 1–25] and Cohen and Sackrowitz [Ann. Statist. (2005) 33 126–144] in the sense that the class of admissible rules is larger for this vector risk formulation than for the linear combination risk function. In other words, fewer procedures are inadmissible for the vector risk formulation. The statistical model assumed is that the vector of variables Z is multivariate normal with mean vector μ and known intraclass covariance matrix Σ. The endpoint hypotheses are Hii=0 vs Kii>0, i=1,…,k. A characterization of all symmetric Bayes procedures and their limits is obtained. The characterization leads to a complete class theorem. The complete class theorem is used to provide a useful necessary condition for admissibility of a procedure. The main result is that the step-up multiple endpoint procedure is shown to be inadmissible.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 62C10, 62C15
Full-text: Open access
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1112967702
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053604000000986
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 02182559
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2157799

References

Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57 289--300.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1325392
Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Statist. 29 1165--1188.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1869245
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1013699998
Zentralblatt MATH: 1041.62061
Brown, L. D., Cohen, A. and Strawderman, W. E. (1976). A complete class theorem for strict monotone likelihood ratio with applications. Ann. Statist. 4 712--722.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR415821
Brown, L. D., Johnstone, I. M. and MacGibbon, K. B. (1981). Variation diminishing transformation: A direct approach to total positivity and its statistical applications. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 76 824--832.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR650893
Cohen, A. and Sackrowitz, H. B. (1984). Decision theory results for vector risks with applications. Statist. Decisions Suppl. 1 159--176.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR785207
Cohen, A. and Sackrowitz, H. B. (2005). Decision theory results for one-sided multiple comparison procedures. Ann. Statist. 33 126--144.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2157798
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053604000000968
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1112967701
Zentralblatt MATH: 1066.62009
Dudoit, S., Shaffer, J. P. and Boldrick, J. C. (2003). Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Statist. Sci. 18 71--103.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1997066
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/ss/1056397487
Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1056397487
Zentralblatt MATH: 1048.62099
Ferguson, T. S. (1967). Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach. Academic Press, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR215390
Zentralblatt MATH: 0153.47602
Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75 800--802.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR995126
Zentralblatt MATH: 0661.62067
Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. Wiley, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR914493
Zentralblatt MATH: 0731.62125
Karlin, S. and Rubin, H. (1956). The theory of decision procedures for distributions with monotone likelihood ratio. Ann. Math. Statist. 27 272--299.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR81593
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728259
Lehmann, E. L. (1957). A theory of some multiple decision problems. I. Ann. Math. Statist. 28 1--25.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR84952
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoms/1177707034
Marshall, A. W. and Olkin, I. (1979). Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. Academic Press, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR552278
Zentralblatt MATH: 0437.26007
Matthes, T. K. and Truax, D. R. (1967). Tests of composite hypotheses for the multivariate exponential family. Ann. Math. Statist. 38 681--697.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR208745
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoms/1177698862
Sarkar, S. (2002). Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures. Ann. Statist. 30 239--257.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1892663
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1015362192
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1015362192
Zentralblatt MATH: 1101.62349
Shaffer, J. P. (1995). Multiple hypothesis testing. Annual Review of Psychology 46 561--584.
Stein, C. (1956). Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. Proc. Third Berkeley Symp. Math. Statist. Probab. 1 197--206. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR84922
Zentralblatt MATH: 0073.35602
Van Houwelingen, H. C. and Verbeek, A. (1985). On the construction of monotone symmetric decision rules for distributions with monotone likelihood ratio. Scand. J. Statist. 12 73--81.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR804227
Weiss, L. (1961). Statistical Decision Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR125722
Zentralblatt MATH: 0121.35601

2012 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics

The Annals of Statistics

The Annals of Statistics