The Annals of Statistics

Single observation unbiased priors

Xiao-Li Meng and Alan M. Zaslavsky
Source: Ann. Statist. Volume 30, Number 5 (2002), 1345-1375.

Abstract

This paper studies a class of default priors, which we call single observation unbiased priors (SOUP). A prior for a parameter is a SOUP if the corresponding posterior mean of the parameter based on a single observation is an unbiased estimator of the parameter. We prove that, under mild regularity conditions, a default prior for a convolution parameter is "noninformative" in the sense of yielding a posterior inference invariant under amalgamation only if it is a SOUP. Therefore, when amalgamation invariance is desirable, as in our motivating example of performing imputation for census undercount, SOUP is the only possible coherent "noninformative" prior for Bayesian predictions that will be utilized under aggregation. The use of SOUP also mutually calibrates Bayesian and frequentist inferences for aggregates of convolution parameters across many small areas. We describe approaches that identify SOUPs in many common models, in particular a constructive duality method that identifies SOUPs in pairs of distribution families. We introduce O-completeness, a necessary and sufficient condition for a prior distribution to be uniquely characterized by the corresponding posterior mean. Uniqueness of the SOUP is determined by the O-completeness of the dual family. O-completeness of a natural exponential family is implied by its completeness. Hence, the Diaconis-Ylvisaker characterization of the conjugate prior for natural exponential families via linear posterior expectation is a direct consequence of the completeness of such families. For most of the examples we have examined, the inverse of the variance function is the SOUP for the mean parameter of the corresponding family, suggesting that Hartigan's results on asymptotic unbiasedness can be generalized to some families with discrete parameters. We also discuss a possible extension of Berger's result on the inadmissibility of unbiased estimators, as the nonexistence of SOUP can be a first step in establishing such inadmissibility.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 62F15
Secondary Subjects: 62C15
Full-text: Open access
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1035844979
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1035844979
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR1936322
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 1019.62024

References

BERGER, J. O. (1985). Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analy sis, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR804611
Zentralblatt MATH: 0572.62008
BERGER, J. O. (1990). On the inadmissibility of unbiased estimators. Statist. Probab. Lett. 9 381-384.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0693.62005
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1060078
BERGER, J. O. and SRINIVASAN, C. (1978). Generalized Bay es estimators in multivariate problems. Ann. Statist. 6 783-801.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR478426
Zentralblatt MATH: 0378.62004
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176344252
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176344252
BICKEL, P. J. and MALLOWS, C. L. (1988). A note on unbiased Bay es estimates. Amer. Statist. 42 132-134.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR89i:62022
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2684486
BROWN, L. D. (1971). Admissible estimates, recurrent diffusions, and insoluble boundary value problems. Ann. Math. Statist. 42 855-903.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR286209
Zentralblatt MATH: 0246.62016
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoms/1177693318
Project Euclid: euclid.aoms/1177693318
BROWN, L. D. (1979). A heuristic method for determining admissibility of estimators, with applications. Ann. Statist. 7 960-994.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0414.62011
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR536501
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176344782
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176344782
BROWN, L. D. (1980). A necessary condition for admissibility. Ann. Statist. 8 540-544.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0444.62013
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR568719
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176345007
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176345007
CONSONNI, G. and VERONESE, P. (1992). Conjugate priors for exponential families having quadratic variance functions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87 1123-1127.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR94f:62050
Zentralblatt MATH: 0764.62027
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2290650
CONSONNI, G. and VERONESE, P. (1993). Unbiased Bay es estimates and improper priors. Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 45 303-315.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR95d:62037
Zentralblatt MATH: 0777.62031
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/BF00775816
DIACONIS, P. and YLVISAKER, D. (1979). Conjugate priors for exponential families. Ann. Statist. 7 269-281.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR80f:62016
Zentralblatt MATH: 0405.62011
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176344611
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176344611
DIACONIS, P. and YLVISAKER, D. (1985). Quantifying prior opinion. In Bayesian Statistics 2 (J. M. Bernardo, D. V. Lindley and A. F. M. Smith, eds.) 133-156. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR88e:62015
Zentralblatt MATH: 0673.62004
FIRTH, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika 80 27-38. [Correction (1995) 82 667.]
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1225212
Zentralblatt MATH: 0769.62021
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/80.1.27
GUTIÉRREZ-PEÑA, E. and SMITH, A. F. M. (1995). Conjugate parameterizations for natural exponential families. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90 1347-1356. [Correction (1996) 91 1757.]
GUTIÉRREZ-PEÑA, E. and SMITH, A. F. M. (1997). Exponential and Bayesian conjugate families: Review and extensions (with discussion). Test 6 1-90.
HARTIGAN, J. (1964). Invariant prior distributions. Ann. Math. Statist. 35 836-845.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR28:4613
Zentralblatt MATH: 0151.23003
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703583
Project Euclid: euclid.aoms/1177703583
HARTIGAN, J. (1965). The asy mptotically unbiased prior distribution. Ann. Math. Statist. 36 1137-1152.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR31:811
Zentralblatt MATH: 0133.42106
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoms/1177699988
Project Euclid: euclid.aoms/1177699988
HARTIGAN, J. (1998). The maximum likelihood prior. Ann. Statist. 26 2083-2103.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2000h:62030
Zentralblatt MATH: 0927.62023
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1024691462
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1024691462
HOGAN, H. (1993). The 1990 post-enumeration survey: Operations and results. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88 1047-1060.
HSIEH, H. K., KORWAR, R. M. and RUKHIN, A. L. (1990). Inadmissibility of the maximum likelihood estimator of the inverse Gaussian mean. Statist. Probab. Lett. 9 83-90.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR91h:62010
Zentralblatt MATH: 0687.62008
HUDSON, H. M. (1978). A natural identity for exponential families with applications in multiparameter estimation. Ann. Statist. 6 473-484.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR57:7832
Zentralblatt MATH: 0391.62006
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176344194
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176344194
HWANG, J. T. (1982). Improving upon standard estimators in discrete exponential families with applications to Poisson and negative binomial cases. Ann. Statist. 10 857-867.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0493.62008
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR663437
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176345876
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176345876
JOHNSON, N. L. (1957). Uniqueness of a result in the theory of accident proneness. Biometrika 44 530-531.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0078.33705
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR93418
KASS, R. E. and WASSERMAN, L. (1996). The selection of prior distributions by formal rules. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91 1343-1370.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0884.62007
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1478684
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/lnms/1215453065
KENDALL, M., STUART, A. and ORD, J. K. (1987). Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics 1. Distribution Theory, 5th ed. Oxford, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR88k:62002
LEHMANN, E. L. (1983). Theory of Point Estimation. Wiley, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR85a:62001
MENG, X. L. (1994). Multiple-imputation inferences with uncongenial sources of input (with discussion). Statist. Sci. 9 538-573.
MORRIS, C. N. (1982). Natural exponential families with quadratic variance functions. Ann. Statist. 10 65-80.
Zentralblatt MATH: 0498.62015
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR642719
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176345690
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176345690
MORRIS, C. N. (1983). Natural exponential families with quadratic variance functions: Statistical theory. Ann. Statist. 11 515-529.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR696064
Zentralblatt MATH: 0521.62014
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176346158
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176346158
NICOLAOU, A. (1993). Bayesian intervals with good frequentist behavior in the presence of nuisance parameters. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 55 377-390.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1224402
RUBIN, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Survey s. Wiley, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR899519
Zentralblatt MATH: 1070.62007
RUBIN, D. B. (1996). Multiple imputation after 18+ years (with discussion). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91 473-520.
RUKHIN, A. L. (1995). Admissibility: A survey of a concept in progress. Inter. Statist. Rev. 63 95-115.
SCHIRM, A. L. and PRESTON, S. H. (1992). Comment on "Should we have adjusted the U.S. Census of 1980?" by D. A. Freedman and W. C. Navidi. Survey Methodology 18 35-43.
STEIN, C. (1986). On the coverage probability of confidence sets based on prior distributions. In Sequential Methods in Statistics, 3rd ed. (G. B. Wetherbil and K.D. Glazebrook, eds.) 485-514. Chapman and Hall, London.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR847495
Zentralblatt MATH: 0662.62030
STIGLER, S. M. (1972). Completeness and unbiased estimation. Amer. Statist. 26 28-29.
VOINOV, V. G. and NIKULIN, M. S. (1993). Unbiased Estimators and Their Applications 1. Univariate Case. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR98e:62037
WELCH, B. L. and PEERS, H. W. (1963). On formulae for confidence points based on integrals of weighted likelihoods. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 25 318-329.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR30:3522
ZASLAVSKY, A. M. (1989). Representing the census undercount: Reweighting and imputation methods. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Mathematics, MIT.
CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS 02138 E-MAIL: meng@stat.harvard.edu DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE POLICY HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL 180 LONGWOOD AVE
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02115-5899 E-MAIL: zaslavsky@hcp.med.harvard.edu

2013 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics

The Annals of Statistics

The Annals of Statistics

Turn MathJax Off
What is MathJax?