We investigate the degree to which posterior expectations are sensitive to prior distributions, using a local method based on functional differentiation. Invariance considerations suggest a family of norms which can be used to measure perturbations to the prior. The sensitivity measure is seen to depend heavily on the choice of norm; asymptotic results suggest which norm will yield the most useful results in practice. We find that to maintain
asymptotically sensible behaviour, it is necessary to reduce the richness of the class of prior perturbations as the dimension of the parameter space increases. Jeffreys' prior is characterized as the prior to which inference
is least sensitive.
References
BASU, S., JAMMALAMADAKA, S. R. and LIU, W. 1993 . Local posterior robustness with parametric priors: maximum and average sensitivity. In Maximum Entropy and Bayesian MethZ . ods G. Heidbreder, ed. Kluwer, Dordecht. Z .
BERGER, J. O. 1986 . Comment on ``On the consistency of Bay es estimates'' by P. Diaconis and D. Freedman Ann. Statist. 14 30 37. Z .
BERGER, J. O. 1990 . Robust Bayesian analysis: sensitivity to the prior. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 25 303 328. Z .
BERGER, J. O. 1992 . Comment on ``Recent methodological advances in robust Bayesian inferZ ence'' by L. Wasserman. In Bayesian Statistics 4 J. M. Bernando, J. O. Berger, A. P. . Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith, eds. 495 496. Oxford Univ. Press. Z . Z .
BERGER, J. O. 1994 . An overview of robust Bayesian analysis with discussion . Test 3 5 124. Z .
BERGER, J. O. and BERLINER, L. M. 1986 . Robust Bay es and empirical Bay es analysis with -contaminated priors. Ann. Statist. 14 461 486. Z .
CHEN, C. F. 1985 . On asy mptotic normality of limiting density functions with Bayesian implications. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 47 540 546. Z .
CIFARELLI, D. M. and REGAZZINI, E. 1987 . On a general definition of concentration function. Sanky a Ser. B 49 307 319. Z .
CLARKE, B. S. and BARRON, A. R. 1994 . Jeffrey s' prior is asy mptotically least favourable under entropy risk. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 41 37 60. Z .
CUEVAS, A. and SANZ, P. 1988 . On differentiability properties of Bay es operators. In Bayesian Z . Statistics 3 J. M. Bernardo, M. H. DeGroot, D. V. Lindley and A. F. M. Smith, eds. 569 577. Oxford Univ. Press. Z .
DELAMPADY, M. and DEY, D. 1994 . Bayesian robustness for multiparameter problems. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 40 375 382. Z .
DEROBERTIS, L. 1978 . The use of partial prior knowledge in Bayesian inference. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale Univ.
DEROBERTIS, L. and HARTIGAN, J. 1981 . Bayesian inference using intervals of measures. Ann. Statist. 9 235 244. Z .
DEY, D. and BIRMIWAL, L. R. 1994 . Robust Bayesian analysis using entropy and divergence measures. Statist. Probab. Lett. 20 287 294. Z . Z .
DIACONIS, P. and FREEDMAN, D. 1986 . On the consistency of Bay es estimates with discussion . Ann. Statist. 14 1 67. Z .
GELFAND, A. and DEY, D. 1991 . On Bayesian robustness of contaminated classes of priors. Statist. Decisions 9 63 80. Z . Z
GOOD, I. J. 1969 . What is the use of a distribution? In Multivariate Analy sis P. R. Krishnaiah, . ed. 2 183 203. Academic Press, New York. Z .
GUSTAFSON, P. 1996 . Local sensitivity of inferences to prior marginals. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 91 To appear. Z .
GUSTAFSON, P. and WASSERMAN, L. 1995 . Local sensitivity diagnostics for Bayesian inference. Ann. Statist. 23 2153 2167. Z .
HARTIGAN, J. A. 1983 . Bay es Theory. Springer, New York. Z .
JEFFREy S, H. 1961 . Theory of Probability, 3rd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford. Z .
KASS, R. E., TIERNEY, L. and KADANE, J. B. 1989 . Approximate methods for assessing influence and sensitivity in Bayesian analysis. Biometrika 76 663 674. Z .
LAVINE, M. 1991a . Sensitivity in Bayesian statistics: the prior and the likelihood. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86 396 399. Z .
LAVINE, M. 1991b . An approach to robust Bayesian analysis for multidimensional parameter spaces. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86 400 403. Z .
LINDLEY, D. V. 1992 . Comment on ``Recent methodological advances ion robust Bayesian Z inference'' by L. Wasserman. In Bayesian Statistics 4 J. M. Bernando, J. O. Berger, A. . P. Dawid and A. F. M. Smith, eds. 496. Oxford Univ. Press. Z .
RUGGERI, F. and WASSERMAN, L. 1993 . Infinitesimal sensitivity of posterior distributions. Canad. J. Statist. 21 195 203. Z .
RUGGERI, F. and WASSERMAN, L. 1995 . Density based classes of priors: infinitesimal properties and approximations. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 46 311 324. Z .
SIVAGANESAN, S. 1988 . Range of posterior measures for priors with arbitrary contaminations. Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 17 1591 1612. Z .
SIVAGANESAN, S. 1993 . Robust Bayesian diagnostics. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 35 171 188. Z .
SRINIVASAN, C. and TRUSZCZy NSKA, H. 1990 . On the ranges of posterior quantities. Technical Report 294, Dept. Statistics, Univ. Kentucky, Lexington. Z .
STEIN, C. 1985 . On the coverage probability of confidence sets based on a prior distribution. In Sequential Methods in Statistics 485 514. PWN Publishers, Warsaw. Z .
WASSERMAN, L. 1992a . Invariance properties of density ratio priors. Ann. Statist. 20 2177 2182. Z . Z
WASSERMAN, L. 1992b . Recent methodological advances in robust Bayesian inference with . Z discussion . In Bayesian Statistics 4 J. M. Bernando, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid and A. . F. M. Smith, eds. 483 502. Oxford Univ. Press. Z .
WASSERMAN, L. 1992c . The conflict between improper priors and robustness. Technical Report 559. Dept. Statistics, Carnegie Mellon Univ.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA CANADA V6T 1Z2