Source: Ann. Probab. Volume 40, Number 4
(2012), 1535-1576.
For an ergodic Markov chain $\{X(t)\}$ on $\mathbb{N}$, with a stationary distribution $\pi$, let $T_{n}>0$ denote a hitting time for $[n]^{c}$, and let $X_{n}=X(T_{n})$. Around 2005 Guy Louchard popularized a conjecture that, for $n\to\infty$, $T_{n}$ is almost $\operatorname{Geometric}(p)$, $p=\pi([n]^{c})$, $X_{n}$ is almost stationarily distributed on $[n]^{c}$ and that $X_{n}$ and $T_{n}$ are almost independent, if $p(n):=\sup_{i}p(i,[n]^{c})\to0$ exponentially fast. For the chains with $p(n)\to0$, however slowly, and with $\sup_{i,j}\|p(i,\cdot)-p(j,\cdot)\|_{\mathrm{TV}}<1$, we show that Louchard’s conjecture is indeed true, even for the hits of an arbitrary $S_{n}\subset\mathbb{N}$ with $\pi(S_{n})\to0$. More precisely, a sequence of $k$ consecutive hit locations paired with the time elapsed since a previous hit (for the first hit, since the starting moment) is approximated, within a total variation distance of order $k\sup_{i}p(i,S_{n})$, by a $k$-long sequence of independent copies of $(\ell_{n},t_{n})$, where $t_{n}=\operatorname{Geometric}(\pi(S_{n}))$, $\ell_{n}$ is distributed stationarily on $S_{n}$ and $\ell_{n}$ is independent of $t_{n}$. The two conditions are easily met by the Markov chains that arose in Louchard’s studies as likely sharp approximations of two random compositions of a large integer $\nu$, a column-convex animal (cca) composition and a Carlitz (C) composition. We show that this approximation is indeed very sharp for each of the random compositions, read from left to right, for as long as the sum of the remaining parts stays above $\ln^{2}\nu$. Combining the two approximations, a composition—by its chain, and, for $S_{n}=[n]^{c}$, the sequence of hit locations paired each with a time elapsed from the previous hit—by the independent copies of $(\ell_{n},t_{n})$, enables us to determine the limiting distributions of $\mu=o(\ln\nu)$ and $\mu=o(\nu^{1/2})$ largest parts of the random cca-composition and the random C-composition, respectively. (Submitted to Annals of Probability in June 2009.)
References
[1] Aldous, D. J. (1982). Markov chains with almost exponential hitting times. Stochastic Process. Appl. 13 305–310.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR671039
[2] Aldous, D. J. and Brown, M. (1992). Inequalities for rare events in time-reversible Markov chains. I. In Stochastic Inequalities (Seattle, WA, 1991). Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes—Monograph Series 22 1–16. IMS, Hayward, CA.
[3] Aldous, D. J. and Brown, M. (1993). Inequalities for rare events in time-reversible Markov chains. II. Stochastic Process. Appl. 44 15–25.
[4] Andrews, G. E. (1976). The Theory of Partitions. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 2. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR557013
[5] Bender, E. A. (1973). Central and local limit theorems applied to asymptotic enumeration. J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. A 15 91–111.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR375433
[6] Bender, E. A. and Canfield, E. R. (2005). Locally restricted compositions. I. Restricted adjacent differences. Electron. J. Combin. 12 1–27 (electronic).
[7] Breiman, L. (1968). Probability. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR229267
[8] Carlitz, L. (1976). Restricted compositions. Fibonacci Quart. 14 254–264.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR414479
[9] Derman, C. (1954). A solution to a set of fundamental equations in Markov chains. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 5 332–334.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR60757
[10] Durrett, R. (2005). Probability: Theory and Examples, 3rd ed. Brooks/Cole, Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA.
[11] Hitczenko, P. and Louchard, G. (2001). Distinctness of compositions of an integer: A probabilistic analysis. Random Structures Algorithms 19 407–437.
[12] Hitczenko, P. and Savage, C. D. (2004). On the multiplicity of parts in a random composition of a large integer. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 18 418–435 (electronic).
[13] Kac, M. (1947). On the notion of recurrence in discrete stochastic processes. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 53 1002–1010.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR22323
[14] Keilson, J. (1979). Markov Chain Models—Rarity and Exponentiality. Applied Mathematical Sciences 28. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR528293
[15] Klarner, D. A. (1965). Some results concerning polyominoes. Fibonacci Quart. 3 9–20.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR186569
[16] Knopfmacher, A. and Prodinger, H. (1998). On Carlitz compositions. European J. Combin. 19 579–589.
[17] Knuth, D. E., Motwani, R. and Pittel, B. (1990). Stable husbands. Random Structures Algorithms 1 1–14.
[18] Louchard, G. (2005). Private communication.
[19] Louchard, G. (1997). Probabilistic analysis of column-convex and directed diagonally-convex animals. Random Structures Algorithms 11 151–178.
[20] Louchard, G. (1999). Probabilistic analysis of column-convex and directed diagonally-convex animals. II. Trajectories and shapes. Random Structures Algorithms 15 1–23.
[21] Louchard, G. and Prodinger, H. (2002). Probabilistic analysis of Carlitz compositions. Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. 5 71–95 (electronic).
[22] Privman, V. and Forgács, G. (1987). Exact solution of the partially directed compact lattice animal model. J. Phys. A 20 L543–L547.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR893296
[23] Privman, V. and Švrakić, N. M. (1988). Exact generating function for fully directed compact lattice animals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 1107–1109.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR932171