Source: Ann. Probab. Volume 38, Number 5
(2010), 2066-2102.
In this paper we study intermittency for the parabolic Anderson equation ∂u/∂t=κΔu+γξu with u : ℤd×[0, ∞)→ℝ, where κ∈[0, ∞) is the diffusion constant, Δ is the discrete Laplacian, γ∈(0, ∞) is the coupling constant, and ξ : ℤd×[0, ∞)→ℝ is a space–time random medium. The solution of this equation describes the evolution of a “reactant” u under the influence of a “catalyst” ξ.
We focus on the case where ξ is the voter model with opinions 0 and 1 that are updated according to a random walk transition kernel, starting from either the Bernoulli measure νρ or the equilibrium measure μρ, where ρ∈(0, 1) is the density of 1’s. We consider the annealed Lyapunov exponents, that is, the exponential growth rates of the successive moments of u. We show that if the random walk transition kernel has zero mean and finite variance, then these exponents are trivial for 1≤d≤4, but display an interesting dependence on the diffusion constant κ for d≥5, with qualitatively different behavior in different dimensions.
In earlier work we considered the case where ξ is a field of independent simple random walks in a Poisson equilibrium, respectively, a symmetric exclusion process in a Bernoulli equilibrium, which are both reversible dynamics. In the present work a main obstacle is the nonreversibility of the voter model dynamics, since this precludes the application of spectral techniques. The duality with coalescing random walks is key to our analysis, and leads to a representation formula for the Lyapunov exponents that allows for the application of large deviation estimates.
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription
detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide
you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify
you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to
this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you
may need to update your profile to register your subscription.
Read more about accessing full-text
References
[1] Bramson, M., Cox, J. T. and Griffeath, D. (1988). Occupation time large deviations of the voter model. Probab. Theory Related Fields 77 401–413.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR931506
[2] Bramson, M., Cox, J. T. and Le Gall, J.-F. (2001). Super-Brownian limits of voter model clusters. Ann. Probab. 29 1001–1032.
[3] Cox, J. T. and Griffeath, D. (1983). Occupation time limit theorems for the voter model. Ann. Probab. 11 876–893.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR714952
[4] Gärtner, J. and Heydenreich, M. (2006). Annealed asymptotics for the parabolic Anderson model with a moving catalyst. Stochastic Process. Appl. 116 1511–1529.
[5] Gärtner, J. and den Hollander, F. (2006). Intermittency in a catalytic random medium. Ann. Probab. 34 2219–2287.
[6] Gärtner, J., den Hollander, F. and Maillard, G. (2007). Intermittency on catalysts: Symmetric exclusion. Electron. J. Probab. 12 516–573 (electronic).
[7] Gärtner, J., den Hollander, F. and Maillard, G. (2009). Intermittency on catalysts. In Trends in Stochastic Analysis (J. Blath, P. Mörters and M. Scheutzow, eds.). London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 353 235–248. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[8] Gärtner, J., den Hollander, F. and Maillard, G. (2009). Intermittency on catalysts: Three-dimensional simple symmetric exclusion. Electron. J. Probab. 14 2091–2129.
[9] Gärtner, J. and König, W. (2005). The parabolic Anderson model. In Interacting Stochastic Systems (J.-D. Deuschel and A. Greven, eds.) 153–179. Springer, Berlin.
[10] Liggett, T. M. (1985). Interacting Particle Systems. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 276. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR776231
[11] Maillard, G. and Mountford, T. (2009). Large deviations for voter model occupation times in two dimensions. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Probab. Statist. 45 577–588.
[12] Spitzer, F. (1976). Principles of Random Walks, 2nd ed. Graduate Texts in Mathematics 34. Springer, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet):
MR388547