The Annals of Probability

The contour of splitting trees is a Lévy process

Amaury Lambert
Source: Ann. Probab. Volume 38, Number 1 (2010), 348-395.

Abstract

Splitting trees are those random trees where individuals give birth at a constant rate during a lifetime with general distribution, to i.i.d. copies of themselves. The width process of a splitting tree is then a binary, homogeneous Crump–Mode–Jagers (CMJ) process, and is not Markovian unless the lifetime distribution is exponential (or a Dirac mass at {∞}). Here, we allow the birth rate to be infinite, that is, pairs of birth times and life spans of newborns form a Poisson point process along the lifetime of their mother, with possibly infinite intensity measure.

A splitting tree is a random (so-called) chronological tree. Each element of a chronological tree is a (so-called) existence point (v, τ) of some individual v (vertex) in a discrete tree where τ is a nonnegative real number called chronological level (time). We introduce a total order on existence points, called linear order, and a mapping φ from the tree into the real line which preserves this order. The inverse of φ is called the exploration process, and the projection of this inverse on chronological levels the contour process.

For splitting trees truncated up to level τ, we prove that a thus defined contour process is a Lévy process reflected below τ and killed upon hitting 0. This allows one to derive properties of (i) splitting trees: conceptual proof of Le Gall–Le Jan’s theorem in the finite variation case, exceptional points, coalescent point process and age distribution; (ii) CMJ processes: one-dimensional marginals, conditionings, limit theorems and asymptotic numbers of individuals with infinite versus finite descendances.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 60J80
Secondary Subjects: 37E25, 60G51, 60G55, 60G70, 60J55, 60J75, 60J85, 92D25
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aop/1264434002
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/09-AOP485
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2599603

References

[1] Aldous, D. (1991). The continuum random tree. I. Ann. Probab. 19 1–28.
[2] Aldous, D. (1993). The continuum random tree. III. Ann. Probab. 21 248–289.
[3] Bertoin, J. (1996). Lévy Processes. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 121. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[4] Bertoin, J., Fontbona, J. and Martínez, S. (2008). On prolific individuals in a supercritical continuous-state branching process. J. Appl. Probab. 45 714–726.
[5] Bertoin, J. and Le Gall, J.-F. (2000). The Bolthausen–Sznitman coalescent and the genealogy of continuous-state branching processes. Probab. Theory Related Fields 117 249–266.
[6] Dress, A. W. M. and Terhalle, W. F. (1996). The real tree. Adv. Math. 120 283–301.
[7] Duquesne, T. (2007). The coding of compact real trees by real valued functions. Preprint. Available at arXiv PR/0604106.
[8] Duquesne, T. and Le Gall, J. F. (2002). Random trees, Lévy processes and spatial branching processes. Astérisque 281 1–147.
[9] Evans, S. N. (2009). Probability and Real Trees. Lecture Notes in Math. 1920. Springer, Berlin.
[10] Geiger, J. and Kersting, G. (1997). Depth-first search of random trees, and Poisson point processes. In Classical and Modern Branching Processes (Minneapolis, MN, 1994). IMA Math. Appl. 84 111–126. Springer, New York.
[11] Jaffard, S. (1999). The multifractal nature of Lévy processes. Probab. Theory Related Fields 114 207–227.
[12] Jiřina, M. (1958). Stochastic branching processes with continuous state space. Czechoslovak Math. J. 8 292–313.
[13] Lambert, A. (2002). The genealogy of continuous-state branching processes with immigration. Probab. Theory Related Fields 122 42–70.
[14] Lambert, A. (2003). Coalescence times for the branching process. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 35 1071–1089.
[15] Lambert, A. (2008). Population dynamics and random genealogies. Stoch. Models 24 45–163.
[16] Lambert, A. (2009). The allelic partition for coalescent point processes. Markov Processes Relat. Fields. Preprint. To appear. Available at arXiv:0804.2572v2.
[17] Lambert, A. (2010). Spine decompositions of Lévy trees. To appear. In preparation.
[18] Le Gall, J.-F. (1993). The uniform random tree in a Brownian excursion. Probab. Theory Related Fields 96 369–383.
[19] Le Gall, J.-F. (2005). Random trees and applications. Probab. Surv. 2 245–311 (electronic).
[20] Le Gall, J.-F. and Le Jan, Y. (1998). Branching processes in Lévy processes: The exploration process. Ann. Probab. 26 213–252.
[21] Neveu, J. (1986). Arbres et processus de Galton–Watson. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Probab. Statist. 22 199–207.
[22] Nerman, O. (1981). On the convergence of supercritical general (C–M–J) branching processes. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 57 365–395.
[23] O’Connell, N. (1995). The genealogy of branching processes and the age of our most recent common ancestor. Adv. in Appl. Probab. 27 418–442.
[24] Popovic, L. (2004). Asymptotic genealogy of a critical branching process. Ann. Appl. Probab. 14 2120–2148.
[25] Revuz, D. and Yor, M. (1999). Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, 3rd ed. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] 293. Springer, Berlin.
[26] Taïb, Z. (1992). Branching Processes and Neutral Evolution. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 93. Springer, Berlin.

2012 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics

The Annals of Probability

The Annals of Probability