Scaling limits of (1+1)-dimensional pinning models with Laplacian interaction
Francesco Caravenna and Jean-Dominique Deuschel
Source: Ann. Probab.
Volume 37, Number 3
(2009), 903-945.
Abstract
We consider a random field ϕ:{1, …, N}→ℝ with Laplacian interaction of the form ∑iV(Δϕi), where Δ is the discrete Laplacian and the potential V(⋅) is symmetric and uniformly strictly convex. The pinning model is defined by giving the field a reward ɛ≥0 each time it touches the x-axis, that plays the role of a defect line. It is known that this model exhibits a phase transition between a delocalized regime (ɛ<ɛc) and a localized one (ɛ>ɛc), where 0<ɛc<∞. In this paper we give a precise pathwise description of the transition, extracting the full scaling limits of the model. We show, in particular, that in the delocalized regime the field wanders away from the defect line at a typical distance N3/2, while in the localized regime the distance is just O((log N)2). A subtle scenario shows up in the critical regime (ɛ=ɛc), where the field, suitably rescaled, converges in distribution toward the derivative of a symmetric stable Lévy process of index 2/5. Our approach is based on Markov renewal theory.
Primary Subjects: 60K35, 60F05, 82B41
Keywords: Pinning model; phase transition; scaling limit; Brascamp–Lieb inequality; Markov renewal theory; Lévy process
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription.
Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers
Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aop/1245434024
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/08-AOP424
Zentralblatt MATH identifier:
05587819
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet):
MR2537545
References
[1] Asmussen, S. (2003). Applied Probability and Queues, 2nd ed. Applications of Mathematics: Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability (New York) 51. Springer, New York.
[2] Bertoin, J. (1996). Lévy Processes. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics 121. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[3] Bingham, N. H., Goldie, C. M. and Teugels, J. L. (1989). Regular Variation. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 27. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
[4] Brascamp, H. J. and Lieb, E. H. (1976). On extensions of the Brunn–Minkowski and Prékopa–Leindler theorems, including inequalities for log concave functions, and with an application to the diffusion equation. J. Functional Analysis 22 366–389.
[5] Caffarelli, L. A. (2000). Monotonicity properties of optimal transportation and the FKG and related inequalities. Comm. Math. Phys. 214 547–563.
[6] Caravenna, F. and Deuschel, J.-D. (2008). Pinning and wetting transition for (1+1)-dimensional fields with Laplacian interaction. Ann. Probab. 36 2388–2433.
[7] Cohn, D. L. (1980). Measure Theory. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.
[8] Feller, W. (1971). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications II, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.
[9] Högnäs, G. (1977). Characterization of weak convergence of signed measures on [0, 1]. Math. Scand. 41 175–184.
[10] Johnson, J. (1985). An elementary characterization of weak convergence of measures. Amer. Math. Monthly 92 136–137.
[11] Kingman, J. F. C. (1993). Poisson Processes. Oxford Studies in Probability 3. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
[12] Marle, C.-M. (1974). Mesures et Probabilités. Collection Enseignement des Sciences 19. Hermann, Paris.