The Annals of Applied Probability

Mafia: A theoretical study of players and coalitions in a partial information environment

Mark Braverman, Omid Etesami, and Elchanan Mossel
Source: Ann. Appl. Probab. Volume 18, Number 3 (2008), 825-846.

Abstract

In this paper, we study a game called “Mafia,” in which different players have different types of information, communication and functionality. The players communicate and function in a way that resembles some real-life situations. We consider two types of operations. First, there are operations that follow an open democratic discussion. Second, some subgroups of players who may have different interests make decisions based on their own group interest. A key ingredient here is that the identity of each subgroup is known only to the members of that group.

In this paper, we are interested in the best strategies for the different groups in such scenarios and in evaluating their relative power. The main focus of the paper is the question: How large and strong should a subgroup be in order to dominate the game?

The concrete model studied here is based on the popular game “Mafia.” In this game, there are three groups of players: Mafia, detectives and ordinary citizens. Initially, each player is given only his/her own identity, except the mafia, who are given the identities of all mafia members. At each “open” round, a vote is made to determine which player to eliminate. Additionally, there are collective decisions made by the mafia where they decide to eliminate a citizen. Finally, each detective accumulates data on the mafia/citizen status of players. The citizens win if they eliminate all mafia members. Otherwise, the mafia wins.

We first find a randomized strategy that is optimal in the absence of detectives. This leads to a stochastic asymptotic analysis where it is shown that the two groups have comparable probabilities of winning exactly when the total population size is R and the mafia size is of order $\sqrt{R}$.

We then show that even a single detective changes the qualitative behavior of the game dramatically. Here, the mafia and citizens have comparable winning probabilities only for a mafia size linear in R. Finally, we provide a summary of simulations complementing the theoretical results obtained in the paper.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 91A18, 91A28, 60J20
Full-text: Open access
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoap/1211819786
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/07-AAP456
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2418230
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 1142.91335

References

[1] Boneh, D. and Golle, P. (2002). Almost entirely correct mixing with applications to voting. In Conference on Computer and Communications Security Archive. Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security 68–77. ACM, New York.
[2] Durrett, R. (2004). Probability: Theory and Examples, 3rd ed. Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1609153
[3] Hart, S. and Aumann, R. J., eds. (1992, 1994, 2002). Handbook of Game Theory, with Economic Applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
[4] Rubinstein, A. (1998). Modeling Bounded Rationality. MIT Press.
[5] Naor, M. (1991). Bit commitment using pseudorandomness. J. Cryptology 4 151–158.
[6] Peled, D. (2001). Software Reliability Methods. Springer, Berlin.
[7] Tel, G. (2000). Introduction to Distributed Algorithms, 2nd ed. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1795315
Zentralblatt MATH: 0961.68157

2012 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics

The Annals of Applied Probability

The Annals of Applied Probability