The Annals of Applied Probability

Dual formulation of the utility maximization problem: The case of nonsmooth utility

B. Bouchard, N. Touzi, and A. Zeghal
Source: Ann. Appl. Probab. Volume 14, Number 2 (2004), 678-717.

Abstract

We study the dual formulation of the utility maximization problem in incomplete markets when the utility function is finitely valued on the whole real line. We extend the existing results in this literature in two directions. First, we allow for nonsmooth utility functions, so as to include the shortfall minimization problems in our framework. Second, we allow for the presence of some given liability or a random endowment. In particular, these results provide a dual formulation of the utility indifference valuation rule.

First Page: Show Hide
Primary Subjects: 90A09, 93E20, 49J52
Secondary Subjects: 60H30, 90A16
Full-text: Open access
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoap/1082737107
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/105051604000000062
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2052898
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 02100750

References

Bouchard, B. (2002). Utility maximization on the real line under proportional transaction costs. Finance and Stochastics 6 495--516.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1932382
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s007800200068
Zentralblatt MATH: 1039.91019
Cvitanić, J. (1999). Minimizing expected loss of hedging in incomplete and constrained markets. SIAM J. Control Optim. 38 1050--1066.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1760059
Cvitanić, J. and Karatzas, I. (1999). On dynamic measures of risk. Finance and Stochastics 3 451--482.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1842283
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s007800050071
Cvitanić, J., Schachermayer, W. and Wang, H. (2001). Utility maximization in incomplete markets with random endowment. Finance and Stochastics 5 259--272.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1841719
Deelstra, G., Pham, H. and Touzi, N. (2001). Dual formulation of the utility maximization problem under transaction costs. Ann. Appl. Probab. 11 1353--1383.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1878301
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoap/1015345406
Project Euclid: euclid.aoap/1015345406
Zentralblatt MATH: 1012.60059
Delbaen, F. and Shachermayer, W. (1998). The fundamental theorem of asset pricing for unbounded stochastic processes. Math. Ann. 312 215--250.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1671792
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s002080050220
Zentralblatt MATH: 0917.60048
Delbaen, F., Grandits, P., Reinländer, T., Samperi, D., Schweizer, M. and Stricker, C. (2002). Exponential hedging and entropic penalties. Math. Finance 12 99--123.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1891730
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/1467-9965.02001
Zentralblatt MATH: 1072.91019
Föllmer, H. and Leukert, P. (2000). Efficient hedging: Cost versus shortfall risk. Finance and Stochastics 4 117--146.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1780323
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1007/s007800050008
Zentralblatt MATH: 0956.60074
Hodges, S. and Neuberger, A. (1989). Optimal replication of contingent claims under transaction costs. Review of Futures Markets 8 222--239.
Hugonnier, J. and Kramkov, D. (2001). Optimal investment with a random endowment in incomplete markets. Unpublished manuscript.
Kabanov, Yu. and Stricker, C. (2002). On the optimal portfolio for the exponential utility maximization: Remarks to the six-author paper. Math. Finance 12 125--134.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1891731
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/1467-9965.t01-1-02002
Kramkov, D. and Schachermayer, W. (1999). The asymptotic elasticity of utility functions and optimal investment in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 9 904--950.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1722287
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoap/1029962818
Project Euclid: euclid.aoap/1029962818
Zentralblatt MATH: 0967.91017
Kramkov, D. and Schachermayer, W. (2001). Necessary and sufficient conditions in the problem of optimal investment in incomplete markets. Unpublished manuscript.
Owen, M. (2002). Utility based optimal hedging in incomplete markets. Ann. Appl. Probab. 12 691--709.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1910645
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoap/1026915621
Project Euclid: euclid.aoap/1026915621
Zentralblatt MATH: 1049.91082
Pham, H. (2000). Minimizing shortfall risk and applications to finance and insurance problems. Ann. Appl. Probab. 12 143--172.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1890060
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoap/1015961159
Project Euclid: euclid.aoap/1015961159
Zentralblatt MATH: 1015.93071
Rockafellar, R. T. (1970). Convex Analysis. Princeton Univ. Press.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR274683
Zentralblatt MATH: 0193.18401
Rogers, L. C. G. (2001). Duality in constrained optimal investment and consumption problems: A synthesis. Lectures presented at the Workshop on Financial Mathematics and Econometrics, Montreal.
Schachermayer, W. (2001). Optimal investment in incomplete markets when wealth may become negative. Ann. Appl. Probab. 11 694--734.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1865021
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aoap/1015345346
Project Euclid: euclid.aoap/1015345346
Zentralblatt MATH: 1049.91085
Schachermayer, W. (2001). How potential investments may change the optimal portfolio for the exponential utility. Unpublished manuscript.

2012 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics

The Annals of Applied Probability

The Annals of Applied Probability