Source: Adv. in Appl. Probab. Volume 44, Number 2
(2012), 583-601.
We show that in preferential attachment models with power-law exponent
τ ∈ (2, 3) the distance between randomly chosen vertices in the
giant component is asymptotically equal to
(4 + o(1))log log N / (-log(τ - 2)), where N
denotes the number of nodes. This is twice the value obtained for the
configuration model with the same power-law exponent. The extra factor reveals
the different structure of typical shortest paths in preferential attachment
graphs.
Full-text: Access denied (no subscription
detected)
We're sorry, but we are unable to provide
you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify
you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to
this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you
may need to update your profile to register your subscription.
Read more about accessing full-text
References
Bennett, G. (1962). Probability inequalities for the sum of independent random variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 57, 33–45.
Bollobás, B. and Riordan, O. (2004). The diameter of a scale-free random graph. Combinatorica 24, 5–34.
Cohen, R. and Havlin, S. (2003). Scale-free networks are ultrasmall. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 058701, 4 pp.
Chung, F. and Lu, L. (2003). The average distance in a random graph with given expected degrees. Internet Math. 1, 91–113.
Chung, F. and Lu, L. (2006). Complex Graphs and Networks (CBMS Regional Conf. Math. 107). American Mathematical Society, Providence RI.
Dommers, S., van der Hofstad, R. and Hooghiemstra, G. (2010). Diameters in preferential attachment models. J. Statist. Phys. 139, 72–107.
Dereich, S. and Mörters, P. (2009). Random networks with sublinear preferential attachment: degree evolutions. Electron. J. Prob. 14, 1222–1267.
Dereich, S. and Mörters, P. (2011). Random networks with concave preferential attachment rule. Jahresber. Deutschen Math. Ver. 113, 21–40.
Dereich, S. and Mörters, P. (2012). Random networks with sublinear preferential attachment: the giant component. To appear in Ann. Prob..
Dorogovtsev, S. N., Mendes, J. F. F. and Samukhin, A. N. (2003). Metric strucure of random networks. Nuclear Phys. B 653, 307–338.
Mönch, C. (2012). Distances in preferential attachment networks. Doctoral Thesis, University of Bath.
Norros, I. and Reittu, H. (2006). On a conditionally Poissonian graph process. Adv. Appl. Prob. 38, 59–75.
Norros, I. and Reittu, H. (2008). Network models with a `soft hierarchy': a random graph construction with loglog scalability. IEEE Network 22, 40–46.
Reittu, H. and Norros, I. (2002). On the effect of very large nodes in internet graphs. In GLOBECOM '02, Vol. III (Proc. Global Telecommun. Conf., Taipei, 2002), pp. 2624–2628.
Resnick, S. I. (2008). Extreme Values, Regular Variation and Point Processes. Springer, New York.
Van der Hofstad, R. (2010). Random graphs and complex networks. Lecture Notes, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Van der Hofstad, R., Hooghiemstra, G. and Znamenski, D. (2007). Distances in random graphs with finite mean and infinite variance degrees. Electron. J. Prob. 12, 703–766.
Van der Hofstad, R. and Hooghiemstra, G. (2008). Universality for distances in power-law random graphs. J. Math. Phys. 49, 125209, 14 pp.