Generalizing Simes’ test and Hochberg’s stepup procedure



The Annals of Statistics

Generalizing Simes’ test and Hochberg’s stepup procedure

Sanat K. Sarkar

Source: Ann. Statist. Volume 36, Number 1 (2008), 337-363.

Abstract

In a multiple testing problem where one is willing to tolerate a few false rejections, procedure controlling the familywise error rate (FWER) can potentially be improved in terms of its ability to detect false null hypotheses by generalizing it to control the k-FWER, the probability of falsely rejecting at least k null hypotheses, for some fixed k>1. Simes’ test for testing the intersection null hypothesis is generalized to control the k-FWER weakly, that is, under the intersection null hypothesis, and Hochberg’s stepup procedure for simultaneous testing of the individual null hypotheses is generalized to control the k-FWER strongly, that is, under any configuration of the true and false null hypotheses. The proposed generalizations are developed utilizing joint null distributions of the k-dimensional subsets of the p-values, assumed to be identical. The generalized Simes’ test is proved to control the k-FWER weakly under the multivariate totally positive of order two (MTP2) condition [J. Multivariate Analysis 10 (1980) 467–498] of the joint null distribution of the p-values by generalizing the original Simes’ inequality. It is more powerful to detect k or more false null hypotheses than the original Simes’ test when the p-values are independent. A stepdown procedure strongly controlling the k-FWER, a version of generalized Holm’s procedure that is different from and more powerful than [Ann. Statist. 33 (2005) 1138–1154] with independent p-values, is derived before proposing the generalized Hochberg’s procedure. The strong control of the k-FWER for the generalized Hochberg’s procedure is established in situations where the generalized Simes’ test is known to control its k-FWER weakly.

Primary Subjects: 62J15
Keywords: Global testing; multiple testing; single-step procedure; stepdown procedure; stepup procedure; generalized Bonferroni procedure; generalized Holm’s procedure; generalized Hochberg’s procedure

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1201877304
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053607000000550
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2387974

References

Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Statist. 29 1165–1188.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1869245
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1013699998
Dudoit, S., Shaffer, J. P. and Boldrick, J. C. (2003). Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Statist. Sci. 18 71–103.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1997066
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/ss/1056397487
Project Euclid: euclid.ss/1056397487
Dudoit, S., van der Laan, M. and Pollard, K. (2002). Multiple testing: Part I. Single-step procedures for control of general type I error rates. Statist. Appl. Gen. Mol. Biol. 3 Article 13.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2101462
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2202/1544-6115.1040
Guo, W. and Rao, M. B. (2006). On generalized closure principle for generalized familywise error rates. Unpublished report.
Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75 800–802.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR995126
Zentralblatt MATH: 0661.62067
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800
Hochberg, Y. and Tamhane, A. C. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. Wiley, New York.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR914493
Zentralblatt MATH: 0731.62125
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Statist. 6 65–70.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR538597
Hommel, G. (1988). A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75 383–386.
Hommel, G. and Hoffman, T. (1987). Controlled uncertainty. In Multiple Hypothesis Testing (P. Bauer, G. Hommel and E. Sonnemann, eds.) 154–161. Springer, Heidelberg.
Karlin, S. and Rinott, Y. (1980). Classes of orderings of measures and related correlation inequalities I: Multivariate totally positive distributions. J. Multivariate Analysis 10 467–498.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR599685
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/0047-259X(80)90065-2
Korn, E., Troendle, T., McShane, L. and Simon, R. (2004). Controlling the number of false discoveries: Application to high-dimensional genomic data. J. Statist. Plann. Inf. 124 279–398.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2080371
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(03)00211-8
Lehmann, E. L. and Romano, J. P. (2005). Generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann. Statist. 33 1138–1154.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2195631
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053605000000084
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1120224098
Romano, J. P. and Shaikh, A. M. (2006). Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann. Statist. 34 1850–1873.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2283720
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053606000000461
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1162567636
Romano, J. P. and Wolf, M. (2005). Stepwise multiple testing as formalized data snooping. Econometrica 73 1237–1282.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2149247
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00615.x
Sarkar, S. K. (1998). Some probability inequalities for ordered MTP2 random variables: A proof of the Simes conjecture. Ann. Statist. 26 494–504.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1626047
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1028144846
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1028144846
Sarkar, S. K. (2002). Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures. Ann. Statist. 30 239–257.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1892663
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1015362192
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1015362192
Sarkar, S. K. (2007). Stepup procedures controlling generalized FWER and generalized FDR. Ann. Statist. To appear.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2382652
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053607000000398
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1201012966
Sarkar, S. K. and Chang, C.-K. (1997). Simes method for multiple hypothesis testing with positively dependent test rtatistics. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92 1601–1608.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1615269
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2965431
Simes, R. J. (1986). An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73 751–754.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR897872
Zentralblatt MATH: 0613.62067
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/73.3.751
Tong, Y. L. (1989). Inequalities for a class of positively dependent random variables with a common marginal. Ann. Statist. 17 429–435.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR981460
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1176347026
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1176347026
van der Laan, M., Dudoit, S. and Pollard, K. (2004). Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives. Stat. Appl. Gen. Mol. Biol. 3 Article 15.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2101464

2009 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics