Stepup procedures controlling generalized FWER and generalized FDR



The Annals of Statistics

Stepup procedures controlling generalized FWER and generalized FDR

Sanat K. Sarkar

Source: Ann. Statist. Volume 35, Number 6 (2007), 2405-2420.

Abstract

In many applications of multiple hypothesis testing where more than one false rejection can be tolerated, procedures controlling error rates measuring at least k false rejections, instead of at least one, for some fixed k≥1 can potentially increase the ability of a procedure to detect false null hypotheses. The k-FWER, a generalized version of the usual familywise error rate (FWER), is such an error rate that has recently been introduced in the literature and procedures controlling it have been proposed. A further generalization of a result on the k-FWER is provided in this article. In addition, an alternative and less conservative notion of error rate, the k-FDR, is introduced in the same spirit as the k-FWER by generalizing the usual false discovery rate (FDR). A k-FWER procedure is constructed given any set of increasing constants by utilizing the kth order joint null distributions of the p-values without assuming any specific form of dependence among all the p-values. Procedures controlling the k-FDR are also developed by using the kth order joint null distributions of the p-values, first assuming that the sets of null and nonnull p-values are mutually independent or they are jointly positively dependent in the sense of being multivariate totally positive of order two (MTP2) and then discarding that assumption about the overall dependence among the p-values.

Primary Subjects: 62J15, 62H15
Secondary Subjects: 62H99
Keywords: Generalized Holm procedure; generalized Hochberg procedure; generalized BH procedure; generalized BY procedure; equicorrelated multivariate normal

Full-text: Access denied (no subscription detected)

We're sorry, but we are unable to provide you with the full text of this article because we are not able to identify you as a subscriber.
If you have a personal subscription to this journal, then please login. If you are already logged in, then you may need to update your profile to register your subscription. Read more about accessing full-text
Links and Identifiers

Permanent link to this document: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1201012966
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053607000000398
Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2382652
Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 1129.62066

References

Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57 289--300.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1325392
Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Statist. 29 1165--1188.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1869245
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1013699998
Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2005). False discovery rate-adjusted multiple confidence intervals for selected parameters (with discussion). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 100 71--93.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2156820
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1198/016214504000001907
Fan, J., Hall, P. and Yao, Q. (2006). To how many simultaneous hypothesis tests can normal, Student's t or bootstrap calibration be applied? Unpublished manuscript.
Genovese, C. and Wasserman, L. (2002). Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 64 499--517.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1924303
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00347
Genovese, C. and Wasserman, L. (2004). A stochastic process approach to false discovery control. Ann. Statist. 32 1035--1061.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2065197
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053604000000283
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1085408494
Hochberg, Y. (1988). A sharper $\rmB$onferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75 800--802.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR0995126
Zentralblatt MATH: 0661.62067
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Statist. 6 65--70.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR0538597
Karlin, S. and Rinott, Y. (1980). Classes of orderings of measures and related correlation inequalities. $\textscI$. Multivariate totally positive distributions. J. Multivariate Anal. 10 467--498.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR0599685
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/0047-259X(80)90065-2
Korn, E., Troendle, J., McShane, L. and Simon, R. (2004). Controlling the number of false discoveries: Application to high-dimensional genomic data. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 124 379--398.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2080371
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(03)00211-8
Lehmann, E. L. and Romano, J. P. (2005). Generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann. Statist. 33 1138--1154.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2195631
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053605000000084
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1120224098
Meinshausen, N. and Rice, J. (2006). Estimating the proportion of false null hypotheses among a large number of independently tested hypotheses. Ann. Statist. 34 373--393.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2275246
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053605000000741
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1146576267
Romano, J. P. and Shaikh, A. M. (2006). Stepup procedures for control of generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann. Statist. 34 1850--1873.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2283720
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053606000000461
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1162567636
Sarkar, S. K. (1998). Some probability inequalities for ordered MTP$_2$ random variables: A proof of the Simes conjecture. Ann. Statist. 26 494--504.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1626047
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1028144846
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1028144846
Sarkar, S. K. (2002). Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures. Ann. Statist. 30 239--257.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1892663
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1015362192
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1015362192
Sarkar, S. K. (2004). FDR-controlling stepwise procedures and their false negatives rates. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 125 119--137.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2086892
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2003.06.019
Sarkar, S. K. (2006). False discovery and false nondiscovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures. Ann. Statist. 34 394--415.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2275247
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053605000000778
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1146576268
Sarkar, S. K. (2007). Generalizing Simes' test and Hochberg's stepup procedure. Ann. Statist. To appear.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2382652
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/009053607000000398
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1201012966
Sarkar, S. K. and Chang, C.-K. (1997). The Simes method for multiple hypothesis testing with positively dependent test statistics. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 92 1601--1608.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1615269
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.2307/2965431
Simes, R. J. (1986). An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 73 751--754.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR0897872
Zentralblatt MATH: 0613.62067
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1093/biomet/73.3.751
Storey, J. D. (2002). A direct approach to false discovery rates. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 64 479--498.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR1924302
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00346
Storey, J. D. (2003). The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the $q$-value. Ann. Statist. 31 2013--2035.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2036398
Digital Object Identifier: doi:10.1214/aos/1074290335
Project Euclid: euclid.aos/1074290335
van der Laan, M., Dudoit, S. and Pollard, K. (2004). Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives. Stat. App. Gen. Mol. Biol. 3 Article 15.
Mathematical Reviews (MathSciNet): MR2101464

2009 © Institute of Mathematical Statistics